CVE-2026-23310

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-03-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded

bond_option_mode_set() already rejects mode changes that would make a loaded XDP program incompatible via bond_xdp_check(). However, bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() has no such guard.

For 802.3ad and balance-xor modes, bond_xdp_check() returns false when xmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac, because the 802.1q payload is usually absent due to hardware offload. This means a user can:

  • Attach a native XDP program to a bond in 802.3ad/balance-xor mode
with a compatible xmit_hash_policy (e.g. layer2+3).
  • Change xmit_hash_policy to vlan+srcmac while XDP remains loaded.

This leaves bond->xdp_prog set but bond_xdp_check() now returning false for the same device. When the bond is later destroyed, dev_xdp_uninstall() calls bond_xdp_set(dev, NULL, NULL) to remove the program, which hits the bond_xdp_check() guard and returns -EOPNOTSUPP, triggering:

WARN_ON(dev_xdp_install(dev, mode, bpf_op, NULL, 0, NULL))

Fix this by rejecting xmit_hash_policy changes to vlan+srcmac when an XDP program is loaded on a bond in 802.3ad or balance-xor mode.

commit 39a0876d595b ("net, bonding: Disallow vlan+srcmac with XDP") introduced bond_xdp_check() which returns false for 802.3ad/balance-xor modes when xmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac. The check was wired into bond_xdp_set() to reject XDP attachment with an incompatible policy, but the symmetric path -- preventing xmit_hash_policy from being changed to an incompatible value after XDP is already loaded -- was left unguarded in bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set().

Note: commit 094ee6017ea0 ("bonding: check xdp prog when set bond mode") later added a similar guard to bond_option_mode_set(), but bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() remained unprotected.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
2.4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 25, 2026

Last Modified

June 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jun 19, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e85fa809e507b9d8eff4840888b8c727e4e8448c
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d36ad7e126c6a0c5f699583309ccc37e3a3263ea
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c262bd0e39320a6d6c8277cb8349ce21c01b8c1
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/479d589b40b836442bbdadc3fdb37f001bb67f26
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ace8027e41f6f094ef6c1aca42d2ed6cd7af54e
generic

bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a80e6ecaf669c77260b44254f4a84d76bf83e89

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23310(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.6.130osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-29 05:02 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-11 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-11 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-06-11 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-10 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-10 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-06-10 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-09 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-09 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-09 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-08 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-06-08 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-07 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-06-07 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-05-28 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-05-28 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23310?
CVE-2026-23310 is a medium vulnerability published on March 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmithashpolicy change when XDP is loaded bondoptionmode_set() already rejects mode changes that would make a loaded XDP program incompatible via bondxdpcheck(). However,…
When was CVE-2026-23310 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23310 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 25, 2026, with the most recent update on June 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23310 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23310 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.4% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23310?
CVE-2026-23310 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23310?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23310, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-23310

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23310?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.