CVE-2026-23219

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slab: Add alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook for memcg_alloc_abort_single

When CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG is enabled, the following warning may be noticed:

[ 3959.023862] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3959.023891] alloc_tag was not cleared (got tag for lib/xarray.c:378) [ 3959.023947] WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:155 at alloc_tag_add+0x128/0x178, CPU#6: mkfs.ntfs/113998 [ 3959.023978] Modules linked in: dns_resolver tun brd overlay exfat btrfs blake2b libblake2b xor xor_neon raid6_pq loop sctp ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 rfkill sunrpc vfat fat sg fuse nfnetlink sr_mod virtio_gpu cdrom drm_client_lib virtio_dma_buf drm_shmem_helper drm_kms_helper ghash_ce drm sm4 backlight virtio_net net_failover virtio_scsi failover virtio_console virtio_blk virtio_mmio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath dm_mod i2c_dev aes_neon_bs aes_ce_blk [last unloaded: hwpoison_inject] [ 3959.024170] CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 113998 Comm: mkfs.ntfs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.19.0-rc7+ #7 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 3959.024182] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 3959.024186] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 3959.024192] pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 3959.024199] pc : alloc_tag_add+0x128/0x178 [ 3959.024207] lr : alloc_tag_add+0x128/0x178 [ 3959.024214] sp : ffff80008b696d60 [ 3959.024219] x29: ffff80008b696d60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000240 [ 3959.024232] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000240 x24: ffff800085d17860 [ 3959.024245] x23: 0000000000402800 x22: ffff0000c0012dc0 x21: 00000000000002d0 [ 3959.024257] x20: ffff0000e6ef3318 x19: ffff800085ae0410 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 3959.024269] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 3959.024281] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff600064101293 [ 3959.024292] x11: 1fffe00064101292 x10: ffff600064101292 x9 : dfff800000000000 [ 3959.024305] x8 : 00009fff9befed6e x7 : ffff000320809493 x6 : 0000000000000001 [ 3959.024316] x5 : ffff000320809490 x4 : ffff600064101293 x3 : ffff800080691838 [ 3959.024328] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000d5bcd640 [ 3959.024340] Call trace: [ 3959.024346] alloc_tag_add+0x128/0x178 (P) [ 3959.024355] __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x11c/0x1a8 [ 3959.024362] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x1b8/0x5e8 [ 3959.024369] xas_alloc+0x304/0x4f0 [ 3959.024381] xas_create+0x1e0/0x4a0 [ 3959.024388] xas_store+0x68/0xda8 [ 3959.024395] __filemap_add_folio+0x5b0/0xbd8 [ 3959.024409] filemap_add_folio+0x16c/0x7e0 [ 3959.024416] __filemap_get_folio_mpol+0x2dc/0x9e8 [ 3959.024424] iomap_get_folio+0xfc/0x180 [ 3959.024435] __iomap_get_folio+0x2f8/0x4b8 [ 3959.024441] iomap_write_begin+0x198/0xc18 [ 3959.024448] iomap_write_iter+0x2ec/0x8f8 [ 3959.024454] iomap_file_buffered_write+0x19c/0x290 [ 3959.024461] blkdev_write_iter+0x38c/0x978 [ 3959.024470] vfs_write+0x4d4/0x928 [ 3959.024482] ksys_write+0xfc/0x1f8 [ 3959.024489] __arm64_sys_write+0x74/0xb0 [ 3959.024496] invoke_syscall+0xd4/0x258 [ 3959.024507] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0x240 [ 3959.024514] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x68 [ 3959.024520] el0_svc+0x40/0xf8 [ 3959.024526] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe8 [ 3959.024533] el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0 [ 3959.024540] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

When __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook() fails, there are two different free paths depending on whether size == 1 or size != 1. In the kmem_cache_free_bulk() path, we do call alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(). However, in memcg_alloc_abort_single() we don't, the above warning will be triggered on the next allocation.

Therefore, add alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook() to the memcg_alloc_abort_single() path.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 18, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm/slab: Add alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook for memcg_alloc_abort_single - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8af57e090790983591f6927b3d89ee6383f8c1e
generic

mm/slab: Add alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook for memcg_alloc_abort_single - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6c53ead2d8fa73206e0a63e9cd9aea6bc929837
generic

mm/slab: Add alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook for memcg_alloc_abort_single - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b8bc72587c79fe52c14732e16a766b6eded00707

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.70—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.73-1~bpo12+1 (12 versions)6.12.73-1—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (99 versions)6.18.10-1—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-18 21:06 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-30 23:57 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 34 more
  1. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-14 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-14 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-13 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-13 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-11 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-11 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-09 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-09 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-07 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-07 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-06 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-06 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-02 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-02 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-07-27 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-07-27 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichment

Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23219?
CVE-2026-23219 is a medium vulnerability published on February 18, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slab: Add alloctaggingslabfreehook for memcgallocabort_single When CONFIGMEMALLOCPROFILINGDEBUG is enabled, the following warning may be noticed: [ 3959.023862] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3959.023891] alloc_tag was…
When was CVE-2026-23219 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23219 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 18, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23219 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23219 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23219?
CVE-2026-23219 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23219?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23219, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23219

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23219?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs