CVE-2026-23110

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-04. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
4.7
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other

The fragile ordering between marking commands completed or failed so that the error handler only wakes when the last running command completes or times out has race conditions. These race conditions can cause the SCSI layer to fail to wake the error handler, leaving I/O through the SCSI host stuck as the error state cannot advance.

First, there is an memory ordering issue within scsi_dec_host_busy(). The write which clears SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT may be reordered with reads counting in scsi_host_busy(). While the local CPU will see its own write, reordering can allow other CPUs in scsi_dec_host_busy() or scsi_eh_inc_host_failed() to see a raised busy count, causing no CPU to see a host busy equal to the host_failed count.

This race condition can be prevented with a memory barrier on the error path to force the write to be visible before counting host busy commands.

Second, there is a general ordering issue with scsi_eh_inc_host_failed(). By counting busy commands before incrementing host_failed, it can race with a final command in scsi_dec_host_busy(), such that scsi_dec_host_busy() does not see host_failed incremented but scsi_eh_inc_host_failed() counts busy commands before SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT is cleared by scsi_dec_host_busy(), resulting in neither waking the error handler task.

This needs the call to scsi_host_busy() to be moved after host_failed is incremented to close the race condition.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
21(Track)
EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
0.8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 4, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated May 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe2f8ad6f0999db3b318359a01ee0108c703a8c3
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc872e35c0df80062abc71268d690a2f749e542e
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fdc6f28d5e81350ab1d2cac8389062bd09e61e1
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d9a367be356101963c249ebf10ea10b32886607
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64ae21b9c4f0c7e60cf47a53fa7ab68852079ef0
generic

scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/219f009ebfd1ef3970888ee9eef4c8a06357f862

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23110(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-14 13:19 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 4.7 · severity → MEDIUM
  14. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 08:07 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-24 22:01 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  21. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-07 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-06-07 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 14:57 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-21 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-20 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-05-20 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-05-20 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23110?
CVE-2026-23110 is a medium vulnerability published on February 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Wake up the error handler when final completions race against each other The fragile ordering between marking commands completed or failed so that the error handler only wakes when the last running command completes or…
When was CVE-2026-23110 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23110 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 4, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23110 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23110 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23110?
CVE-2026-23110 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23110?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23110, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-23110

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23110?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.