CVE-2026-23086

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-04. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size

The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc, which is set from the remote endpoint's SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value.

On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather than the host's own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory. The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since virtio transports share the same code base.

Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume peer_buf_alloc.

This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer's advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own vsock settings.

On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with 32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited.

With this patch applied:

Before: MemFree: ~61.6 GiB Slab: ~142 MiB SUnreclaim: ~117 MiB

After 32 high-credit connections: MemFree: ~61.5 GiB Slab: ~178 MiB SUnreclaim: ~152 MiB

Only ~35 MiB increase in Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the guest remains responsive.

Compatibility with non-virtio transports:

  • VMCI uses the AF_VSOCK buffer knobs to size its queue pairs per
socket based on the local vsk->buffer_* values; the remote side cannot enlarge those queues beyond what the local endpoint configured.
  • Hyper-V's vsock transport uses fixed-size VMBus ring buffers and
an MTU bound; there is no peer-controlled credit field comparable to peer_buf_alloc, and the remote endpoint cannot drive in-flight kernel memory above those ring sizes.
  • The loopback path reuses virtio_transport_common.c, so it
naturally follows the same semantics as the virtio transport.

This change is limited to virtio_transport_common.c and thus affects virtio-vsock, vhost-vsock, and loopback, bringing them in line with the "remote window intersected with local policy" behaviour that VMCI and Hyper-V already effectively have.

[Stefano: small adjustments after changing the previous patch] [Stefano: tweak the commit message]

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 4, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fef7110ae5617555c792a2bb4d27878d84583adf
generic

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d5f222558b42f6277eafaaa6080966faf37676
generic

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0e42fb0e054c2b2ec4ee80f48ccd256ae0227ce
generic

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ee784fdf006cbe8739cfa093f54d326cbf54037
generic

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84ef86aa7120449828d1e0ce438c499014839711

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23086(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 113 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 22:51 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-14 13:19 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  3. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 08:07 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-24 22:01 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  52. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-07 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-06-07 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23086?
CVE-2026-23086 is a medium vulnerability published on February 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peerbufalloc, which is set from the remote endpoint's SOVMSOCKETSBUFFERSIZE value. On the host side this means that the…
When was CVE-2026-23086 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23086 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 4, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23086 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23086 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23086?
CVE-2026-23086 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23086?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23086, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-23086

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23086?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.