In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/ena: fix missing lock when update devlink params
Fix assert lock warning while calling devl_param_driverinit_value_set()
in ena.
WARNING: net/devlink/core.c:261 at devl_assert_locked+0x62/0x90, CPU#0: kworker/0:0/9
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: Amazon EC2 m8i-flex.4xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
RIP: 0010:devl_assert_locked+0x62/0x90
Call Trace:
devl_param_driverinit_value_set+0x15/0x1c0
ena_devlink_alloc+0x18c/0x220 [ena]
? __pfx_ena_devlink_alloc+0x10/0x10 [ena]
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x140
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x8c/0x130
? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x5d/0x80
? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x80
? devm_ioremap_wc+0x9a/0xd0
ena_probe+0x4d2/0x1b20 [ena]
? __lock_acquire+0x56a/0xbd0
? __pfx_ena_probe+0x10/0x10 [ena]
? local_clock+0x15/0x30
? __lock_release.isra.0+0x1c9/0x340
? mark_held_locks+0x40/0x70
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x92/0x170
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x140
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x8c/0x130
? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x5d/0x80
? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x80
? __pfx_ena_probe+0x10/0x10 [ena]
......
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it