EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- •CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.4Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed
The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: Junos OS: 22.3R3-S5, 22.4R3-S10, 23.2R2-S7, 23.4R2-S8, 24.2R1, and all subsequent releases (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.) — apply it.
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the management daemon (mgd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, high-privileged attacker setting or deactivating a specific SSH configuration parameter to create a Denial of Service (DoS).
A local high-privileged user configuring or deactivating a specific 'system services ssh' configuration parameter can exploit a null pointer dereference in one of the functions used by SSH. The function attempts to dereference a null pointer when accessing certain configuration data, resulting in an mgd process crash and restart. Continued execution of these configuration commands will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
This issue affects:
Junos OS:
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S5;
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S10;
* from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S7;
* from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S8.
This issue does not affect Junos OS before 22.3R1.
Junos OS Evolved:
* from 22.3R1-EVO before 23.2R2-S7-EVO;
* from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S8-EVO.
This issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved before 22.3R1-EVO.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: Junos OS: 22.3R3-S5, 22.4R3-S10, 23.2R2-S7, 23.4R2-S8, 24.2R1, and all subsequent releases (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it