@neo4j/graphql from 5.2.0 until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level @authentication rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level @authentication rule is also present on the same operation type. When both a type-level @authentication (on Query/Mutation) and a field-level @authentication (on a root custom-resolver field within that type) are declared, only the type-level rule is evaluated and the field-level rule is silently discarded. As a result a stricter per-field requirement — such as an admin-role JWT claim (jwt: { roles_INCLUDES: "admin" }) — is never checked, and any client that satisfies the coarser type-level requirement can invoke the more-restricted field. No token forgery is involved: a legitimately issued, correctly signed non-admin token (e.g. roles: ["user"]) is sufficient.
CVE-2026-19869
This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 80% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6(medium)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity76% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 18, 2026
Last Modified
August 19, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 18, 2026Privilege Escalation via Dropped Field-Level @authentication on Root Custom-Resolver Fields in @neo4j/graphql · Advisory · neo4j/graphql · GitHub
https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-82m8-p9px-c3x5Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 11:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 09:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 16:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-19869?
When was CVE-2026-19869 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-19869 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-19869?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-19869?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-19869
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-19869?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.