CVE-2026-19583

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-75233 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationThe upstream fix is not in a release yet: until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

Velociraptor allows some sensitive artifacts to be gated by additional permissions. For example, the Linux.Sys.BashShell artifact allows arbitrary command execution on endpoints, and so it requires the EXECVE permission to schedule. However, no such check was implemented for client monitoring artifacts. Additionally there was no requirement that client monitoring artifacts carry the CLIENT_EVENTS type. This allows any user who can schedule client monitoring artifacts to also schedule otherwise restricted artifacts (such as Linux.Sys.BashShell).

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 10, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

Bugfix: Enforce required permissions on client monitoring

Fix merged in Velocidex/velociraptor PR #4967 on 2026-08-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/Velocidex/velociraptor/pull/4967
Web page

CVE-2026-19583 Velociraptor Required Permissions bypass by using client monitoring queries. – Velociraptor - Digging deeper!

http://docs.velociraptor.app/announcements/advisories/cve-2026-19583/

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-19583(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 342 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 242 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 05:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  3. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 05:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  6. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  9. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 03:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 02:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  18. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 01:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  21. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 02:25 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-06 00:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  25. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 00:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  3. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 23:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  6. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 22:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  9. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-11-01 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-01 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-31 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-31 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 20:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-30 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  18. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  21. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 19:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  24. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 17:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-27 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  27. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  28. 2026-10-26 17:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-26 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  30. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  31. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  32. 2026-10-25 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  33. 2026-10-25 14:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  35. 2026-10-24 15:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  37. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  38. 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  40. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  41. 2026-10-22 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-22 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  43. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  44. 2026-10-21 13:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  46. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  47. 2026-10-20 12:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-20 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  49. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  50. 2026-10-19 11:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-19 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  52. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  53. 2026-10-18 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  54. 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  56. 2026-10-17 08:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  58. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  59. 2026-10-16 07:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-16 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  61. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  62. 2026-10-15 06:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-15 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  64. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  65. 2026-10-14 02:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-14 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  67. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  68. 2026-10-12 22:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-12 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  70. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  71. 2026-10-12 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-11 21:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  73. 2026-10-11 20:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-11 17:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfjq-fc5j-227m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-19583?
CVE-2026-19583 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 10, 2026. Velociraptor allows some sensitive artifacts to be gated by additional permissions. For example, the Linux.Sys.BashShell artifact allows arbitrary command execution on endpoints, and so it requires the EXECVE permission to schedule. However, no such check was implemented for client monitoring…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-19583 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-19583 was published on September 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-19583 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-19583 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-19583?
CVE-2026-19583 has a CVSS base score of 9.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-19583?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-19583 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-19583 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-19583

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-19583?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.