CVE-2026-17350

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-31. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The per-tool permission system (custom roles / role-based tool permissions, introduced in pgAdmin 4 9.3) did not enforce its permission check consistently. In SERVER mode, pgAdmin 4 gates each tool behind a per-tool Flask-Security permission, but the permission decorator (permissions_required) was applied only to a single "front door" route per tool. Every other backend route and Socket.IO handler in that tool's workflow relied solely on pga_login_required/socket_login_required, which check authentication but not the tool permission.

The reporter verified three cases against a test build: (1) a user without tools_query_tool permission received 403 on the protected sqleditor initialization route, but the same session went on to connect the server, initialize the viewdata backend chain, and retrieve real table row content; (2) a user without tools_grant_wizard received 403 on the protected acl route, but the same session still enumerated grantable objects, generated GRANT SQL, and successfully applied it -- confirmed database-side via has_table_privilege(); (3) a user without tools_schema_diff received 403 on the protected panel route, but the same session initialized schema diff, enumerated and connected databases, and obtained real DDL differences via the compare_database Socket.IO handler. The reporter also confirmed a related but distinct issue: a non-owner triggering /misc/workspace/adhoc_connect_server against an administrator-owned shared server caused pgAdmin to persist a new server row still owned by the administrator (user_id/shared unchanged from the source), even though the connection attempt itself reported failure.

During remediation, the same front-door-only permission gap was found to also affect the ERD, PSQL, and Debugger tools, and the Backup, Restore, Maintenance, and Import/Export blueprints, none of which were part of the original report; these were fixed using the same pattern as an extension of the reported defect class.

An authenticated user who had valid pgAdmin login and a stored, working database connection, but had been explicitly denied a specific tool's permission by an administrator, could therefore still drive that tool end-to-end through its other routes and sockets, including obtaining an interactive psql session over the /pty Socket.IO namespace and invoking backup/restore/maintenance/import-export jobs.

Because the bypass only restores access to tools operating over the user's own already-authenticated database connection, it does not grant the user any database privilege they did not already hold; it circumvents pgAdmin's own tool-level access-control policy (an organisational segregation-of-duties control, separate from database-level authorization), letting a user reach a pgAdmin feature an administrator intended to withhold from them, using capabilities their existing database role already permits through other means.

Socket.IO event handlers had no permission-aware equivalent of permissions_required; only socket_login_required existed, checking authentication but not the tool permission.

Fix adds a socket_permissions_required decorator (mirroring permissions_required, honouring the Administrator bypass, reading permissions via has_permission()) and applies it, alongside permissions_required, as the outermost decorator on every backend route and Socket.IO handler for the affected tools. Regression tests assert 403 on every gated route and socket handler for a permission-less user.

This issue affects pgAdmin 4 in SERVER mode: from 9.3 before 9.17.

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
24
EG Risk 24/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity54% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
29th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

July 31, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 31, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
generic

Tool permission bypass via backend routes and Socket.IO handlers (CVE-2026-17350) · Issue #10190 · pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 · GitHub

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10190
github_commit

commit d36bd8dc9681 (pgadmin-org/pgadmin4)

Fix landed in pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 commit d36bd8dc9681 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/d36bd8dc96812c716664feac533d240544e70adc
github_commit

commit ba1984718ad7 (pgadmin-org/pgadmin4)

Fix landed in pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 commit ba1984718ad7 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/ba1984718ad703011740ad48cb9b82402b89cc2c
github_commit

commit 64a9cdbd6a24 (pgadmin-org/pgadmin4)

Fix landed in pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 commit 64a9cdbd6a24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/64a9cdbd6a240a962144f84418beaf9e66419779
github_commit

commit 461c3afba92b (pgadmin-org/pgadmin4)

Fix landed in pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 commit 461c3afba92b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/461c3afba92baad37c70a6fbd52d205d13a9de53

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-17350(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 160 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-04 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-02 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-02 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-01 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-01 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-29 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-29 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-27 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-27 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-24 10:22 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-24 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-23 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-23 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-22 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-22 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-19 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-19 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-18 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-18 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-17 07:03 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-17 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-16 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-16 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-15 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-13 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-13 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-12 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-12 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-11 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-11 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-10 10:02 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-10 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-09-09 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-09 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-07 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-07 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-06 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-06 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-05 04:41 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-05 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-09-03 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-03 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-09-02 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-02 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-09-01 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-30 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-29 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-29 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-28 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-28 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-26 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-26 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-24 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-24 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-23 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-23 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-22 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-22 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-21 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-21 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-20 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-20 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-17350?
CVE-2026-17350 is a medium vulnerability published on July 31, 2026. The per-tool permission system (custom roles / role-based tool permissions, introduced in pgAdmin 4 9.3) did not enforce its permission check consistently. In SERVER mode, pgAdmin 4 gates each tool behind a per-tool Flask-Security permission, but the permission decorator (permissionsrequired) was…
When was CVE-2026-17350 disclosed?
CVE-2026-17350 was first published on July 31, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-17350 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-17350 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-17350?
CVE-2026-17350 has a CVSS base score of 5.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-17350?
A fix for CVE-2026-17350 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-17350 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-17350

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-17350?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.