systemd-homed contains a local privilege escalation bug via arbitrary system group addition to a local, logged in, homed-managed user
CVE-2026-16742
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: <0.1% (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.7
- EG Score
- 6.7MEDIUMlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 30EG Risk 30/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity67% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- <0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- below the 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
August 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 1, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 10, 2026systemd-homed: local privilege escalation via missing home-record signature verification on the authenticate path · Advisory · systemd/systemd · GitHub
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/security/advisories/GHSA-jm29-p7hh-vjhvPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | udev (259.5-0ubuntu3.4) @ resolute | 2026-10-06 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 252.11-1 ... 262~rc3-1 (188 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 257.13-1~deb13u1 ... 262~rc3-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 257.13-1~deb13u1 ... 261~rc4-1 (34 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-06 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 12:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 23:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 02:39 UTCVendor advisory
Show 51 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-13 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-03 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 15:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-29 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 10:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 13:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 13:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:systemd
- CVE-2022-2526EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-21029EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-7510EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-1000082EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-50387NVD 7.5EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-15688EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2023-50868NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2017-9445NVD 7.5EG 8.2EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2023-26604EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2020-1712EG 7.8HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-16742?
When was CVE-2026-16742 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-16742 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16742?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16742?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-16742
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16742?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.