The Epeken All Kurir for Woocommerce WordPress plugin through 2.1.2 does not verify that a payment-confirmation request originates from the owner of the targeted order, nor that any payment actually occurred, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary orders as confirmed and, in a non-default configuration, paid.
CVE-2026-16739
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-14. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 27(Track)EG Risk 27/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 13%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 14, 2026
Last Modified
August 14, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026Epeken All Kurir <= 2.1.2 – Unauthenticated Order Payment Confirmation Forgery | CVE 2026-16739 | Plugin Vulnerabilities
https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b66b86f9-e49e-4654-84a1-0f2e5c859289/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-16739(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-21 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 10:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 16:04 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.90
- 2026-08-14 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 16:03 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 5.9 · severity → MEDIUM
Show 3 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-14 06:26 UTCNVD update
- 2026-08-14 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 06:09 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-287
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-16739?
When was CVE-2026-16739 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-16739 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16739?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16739?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-16739
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16739?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.