CVE-2026-16000

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

Missing cryptographic step in the DSTU 7624 CCM mode implementation (KCcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an attacker who can observe encrypted messages of known or chosen content to forge ciphertexts with valid authentication tags, via messages encrypted without associated data. The cause is that the G1 block, which binds the nonce, the message length and the parameter flags into the CBC-MAC, was processed only when associated data was present. Without associated data the tag was a CBC-MAC of the plaintext alone, independent of the nonce. Only applications that use KCcmBlockCipher directly and supply no associated data are affected.

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity87% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

October 2, 2026

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit b01e9e6c0e23 (bcgit/bc-csharp)

Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit b01e9e6c0e23 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/b01e9e6c0e231b90867fbaf03bf148bde6f9ccfb
generic

CVE 2026 16000 · bcgit/bc-csharp Wiki · GitHub

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-16000

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-16000(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-03 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-02 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-02 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 07:07 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-16000?
CVE-2026-16000 is a high vulnerability published on October 2, 2026. Missing cryptographic step in the DSTU 7624 CCM mode implementation (KCcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an attacker who can observe encrypted messages of known or chosen content to forge ciphertexts with valid authentication tags, via messages…
When was CVE-2026-16000 disclosed?
CVE-2026-16000 was first published on October 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-16000 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-16000 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16000?
CVE-2026-16000 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16000?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-16000 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-16000 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-16000

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16000?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.