CVE-2026-15999

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

Improper validation of integrity check value in the AES-CCM implementation (CcmParameters and CcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an on-path attacker to modify CCM-encrypted content without detection via an AlgorithmIdentifier whose CCMParameters declare an authentication tag (aes-ICVlen) of zero or another length outside the RFC 5084 set, because CcmParameters accepted any value and CcmBlockCipher validated the tag length only when encrypting, so decryption compared a zero-length or very short tag. Affected paths include ParameterUtilities.GetCipherParameters, used by CmsEnvelopedData and CmsEnvelopedDataParser for EnvelopedData encrypted with AES-CCM, and any caller passing an unchecked tag length to CcmBlockCipher for decryption.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity82% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

October 2, 2026

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 9d284d8f3796 (bcgit/bc-csharp)

Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 9d284d8f3796 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/9d284d8f379614def853b590c62bbb31c48f7af0
github_commit

commit 2818bdfa55ef (bcgit/bc-csharp)

Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 2818bdfa55ef — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/2818bdfa55efd58b0d6a1c75f360b8404d879780
generic

CVE 2026 15999 · bcgit/bc-csharp Wiki · GitHub

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-15999

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-15999(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-03 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-03 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-15999?
CVE-2026-15999 is a high vulnerability published on October 2, 2026. Improper validation of integrity check value in the AES-CCM implementation (CcmParameters and CcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an on-path attacker to modify CCM-encrypted content without detection via an AlgorithmIdentifier whose CCMParameters…
When was CVE-2026-15999 disclosed?
CVE-2026-15999 was first published on October 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-15999 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-15999 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-15999?
CVE-2026-15999 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-15999?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-15999 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-15999 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-15999

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-15999?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.