A flaw was found in samba's pam_winbind. When mkhomedir is enabled, pam_winbind chowns the target account's home directory without validating the path is not a critical system directory such as /. On affected systems, accounts with / as their home directory (a common default for system accounts) can have this triggered not only by root, but by a non-root user holding a narrow sudo delegation to run commands as that account, causing ownership of / to change and resulting in severe denial of service (SSH, sudo, and package-manager failures). The change does not grant write access to / (which ships with restrictive 0555 permissions on RHEL), so the impact is availability loss rather than further privilege escalation.
CVE-2026-15779
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 6.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.1; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.1
- EG Score
- 6.1MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 27EG Risk 27/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity61% × 45%The EG Score, 6.1 of 10.Exploitation0.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- below the 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 15, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026nsswitch/pam_winbind.c · samba-4.24.3 · The Samba Team / Samba · GitLab
https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/blob/samba-4.24.3/nsswitch/pam_winbind.c#L1590nsswitch/pam_winbind.c · samba-4.23.5 · The Samba Team / Samba · GitLab
https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/blob/samba-4.23.5/nsswitch/pam_winbind.c#L1622nsswitch/pam_winbind.c · samba-4.19.4 · The Samba Team / Samba · GitLab
https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/blob/samba-4.19.4/nsswitch/pam_winbind.c2499991 – (CVE-2026-15779) CVE-2026-15779 samba-winbind: samba: pam_winbind mkhomedir chowns critical system paths without validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2499991cve-details
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15779Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-15779(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winbind (2:4.23.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2) @ resolute | 2026-10-01 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1 ... 2:4.24.5+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (245 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.17.10+dfsg-0+deb12u1 ... 2:4.25.0~rc1+dfsg-1 (178 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.22.10+dfsg-0+deb13u1 ... 2:4.25.0~rc1+dfsg-1 (47 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.22.3+dfsg-4 ... 2:4.25.0~rc1+dfsg-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 191 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-09-28 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-13 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-11 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-08 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-05 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-31 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-30 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-27 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 23:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-26 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-25 23:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 23:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-24 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-23 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-22 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-22 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 00:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-21 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6fmw-7w5g-3pf9 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-08-20 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 00:17 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:samba
- CVE-2025-10230EG 10.0EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-1472EG 10.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-0240EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2012-1182EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2007-2446EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2004-0882EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-1154EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0600EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-0196EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-0201EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
Same vendor
4 shownubuntu:USN-8621-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-15779?
When was CVE-2026-15779 made public?
Is CVE-2026-15779 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-15779?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-15779?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-15779
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-15779?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.