Trail of Bits fickling versions up to and including 0.1.10 do not include the Python standard library modules _posixsubprocess, site, and atexit in the UNSAFE_IMPORTS denylist (fickle.py). Because these modules are absent from the denylist, fickling's check_safety() function returns LIKELY_SAFE with zero findings for pickle payloads that invoke dangerous functions including _posixsubprocess.fork_exec (C-level process spawner capable of executing arbitrary binaries), site.execsitecustomize (executes arbitrary site customization code), and atexit._run_exitfuncs (triggers all registered exit handler callbacks). The fickling.load() API chains check_safety() into pickle.loads() as an explicit security gate; a LIKELY_SAFE verdict causes the payload to be deserialized and executed. This shares the same root cause as CVE-2026-22607 (cProfile), CVE-2025-67748 (pty), and CVE-2025-67747 (marshal/types). OvertlyBadEvals does not flag these modules because they are standard library imports. UnsafeImports does not flag them because they are not in the denylist. The UnusedVariables heuristic is defeated by the SETITEMS opcode pattern.
CVE-2026-14534
Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-04. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8(high)
- EPSS
- 24.8%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 4, 2026
Last Modified
July 6, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 4, 2026Bypass of check_safety() via unlisted standard library modules (_posixsubprocess, site, atexit) · Advisory · trailofbits/fickling · GitHub
https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/advisories/GHSA-m6fh-58r7-x697v0.1.11
Patch available: trailofbits/fickling v0.1.11
https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/releases/tag/v0.1.11Expand UNSAFE_IMPORTS blocklist (GHSA-m6fh-58r7-x697)
Patch available: trailofbits/fickling v0.1.11 (PR #272 merged 2026-05-06)
https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/pull/272commit e8408615b63a (trailofbits/fickling)
Patch available: trailofbits/fickling v0.1.11 (contains commit e8408615b63a)
https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/e8408615b63adf034f891f653692ab9b51f0f5afVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-14534(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-07 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-06 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-06 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-06 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-05 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-05 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-05 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-04 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-04 13:46 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-14534?
When was CVE-2026-14534 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-14534 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-14534?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-14534?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-14534
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-14534?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.