SuperTokens Core is an open source authentication server. From 11.3.0 until 11.3.8, 11.4.8, 12.0.11, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, and 12.3.1, SAML.handleCallback does not consume RelayState, record assertion identifiers, or enforce Response.InResponseTo. In the SP-initiated flow, an attacker who obtains a legitimately issued, still-valid SAML response and its matching RelayState can resubmit the pair to /recipe/saml/callback before the assertion's NotOnOrAfter time; in the IdP-initiated flow, the assertion can be replayed without RelayState. The missing Response.InResponseTo check also permits an in-progress login to be completed with an assertion for a different identity and fails to enforce allowIDPInitiatedLogin=false. The callback does not validate Destination or SubjectConfirmationData Recipient and NotOnOrAfter, and each accepted callback mints a fresh, independently redeemable authorization code carrying the captured user's identity. This issue is fixed in versions 11.3.8, 11.4.8, 12.0.11, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, and 12.3.1.
CVE-2026-123801
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-120152 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 7.4HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity74% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 9, 2026
Last Modified
November 12, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026v12.0.11
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.0.11
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/releases/tag/v12.0.11v11.4.8
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.4.8
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/releases/tag/v11.4.8v11.3.8
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.3.8
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/releases/tag/v11.3.8commit ca2bca9bc900 (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.3.1 (contains commit ca2bca9bc900)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/ca2bca9bc900c2fd399d508818ad026cc977dcf6commit b6730e608b2d (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.4.8 (contains commit b6730e608b2d)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/b6730e608b2d4562939cd4f41ea07df5f841dfe5commit 5c42f02e98f6 (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.0.11 (contains commit 5c42f02e98f6)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/5c42f02e98f67174c6a5a800dd9f8bd5b6e98486commit 557835406547 (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.2.1 (contains commit 557835406547)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/557835406547d269f5d0e33159630a1873461c38commit 4e05d8cf6028 (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.1.2 (contains commit 4e05d8cf6028)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/4e05d8cf60287e9d2720140031a8b8f4430d056fcommit 075655222f5e (supertokens/supertokens-core)
Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.3.8 (contains commit 075655222f5e)
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/075655222f5e72f3683a127e45c83c4174fbd4f7SAML callback accepts a replayed RelayState + SAMLResponse, minting a fresh authorization code on each replay · Advisory · supertokens/supertokens-core · GitHub
https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/security/advisories/GHSA-3r7x-rhvc-fw28Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-12 22:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-11-10 19:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-11-09 19:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 19:00 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-120152 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-09 18:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 7.4 HIGH
- 2026-11-09 18:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-123801?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-123801 published?
Is CVE-2026-123801 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-123801?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-123801?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-123801
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-123801?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.