CVE-2026-123800

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-120149 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

SuperTokens Core is an open source authentication server. From 6.0.0 until 6.0.24, 7.0.23, 8.0.7, 9.0.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.7, 9.3.5, 10.0.8, 10.1.9, 11.0.9, 11.1.4, 11.2.4, 11.3.8, 11.4.8, 12.0.11, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, and 12.3.1, Multitenancy.checkPermissionsForCreateOrUpdate in src/main/java/io/supertokens/multitenancy/Multitenancy.java does not adequately authorize updates to a parent connection URI domain or the base tenant. In a licensed multi-tenant deployment with multiple applications under one non-default connection URI domain and separate api_keys, an attacker holding one application's valid API key can update the parent domain because the CUD-target branch checks the domain without requiring the source application and tenant to be public. Because api_keys is not protected, the attacker can replace the parent key and then sibling application keys, read or modify sibling users, obtain sessions as those users, establish persistence through a sibling dashboard user, and lock out the sibling application's own key. In the advisory's v2 create or update handlers, omitting the optional identifier produces a base-tenant target that skips the permission branches and enterprise-feature gate, allowing changes to firstFactors, required secondary factors, and recipe-enabled flags that affect login integrity and availability. The base-target variant still rejects coreConfig and does not establish key theft. This issue is fixed in versions 6.0.24, 7.0.23, 8.0.7, 9.0.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.7, 9.3.5, 10.0.8, 10.1.9, 11.0.9, 11.1.4, 11.2.4, 11.3.8, 11.4.8, 12.0.11, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, and 12.3.1.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 9, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 8db9b0c39f97 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.2.1 (contains commit 8db9b0c39f97)

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/8db9b0c39f97f240e116821434d4eb3c907faccf
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 64dfa92c50a2 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.0.11 (contains commit 64dfa92c50a2)

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/64dfa92c50a2ec288fe787ee5c2fad45548a6475
GitHub commit

commit 61bfd3ebde1c (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Fix landed in supertokens/supertokens-core commit 61bfd3ebde1c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/61bfd3ebde1cf4b092da85ee884fa15e288aad51
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 4d1ef0e17768 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.2.4 (contains commit 4d1ef0e17768)

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/4d1ef0e177681f4f74995e4a25a17d224effe115
GitHub commit

commit 4902b713f313 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Fix landed in supertokens/supertokens-core commit 4902b713f313 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/4902b713f31306ca41148070d10b6185f0e85201
GitHub commit

commit 337bb3eba812 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Fix landed in supertokens/supertokens-core commit 337bb3eba812 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/337bb3eba812a5ee52d57854701820a0580b6050
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 1d9dcb03ce06 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v11.4.8 (contains commit 1d9dcb03ce06)

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/1d9dcb03ce0691d9b8abee48f86cc2729a6008cb
GitHub commit

commit 1cc02b971f06 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Fix landed in supertokens/supertokens-core commit 1cc02b971f06 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/1cc02b971f064c2fa2d9bc74b9e85795fdc6a7e5
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 13c3de170dd4 (supertokens/supertokens-core)

Patch available: supertokens/supertokens-core v12.1.2 (contains commit 13c3de170dd4)

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/commit/13c3de170dd40dd217db0f6bd2bded0948476a42
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

App-scoped API key can overwrite the parent connection URI domain's credentials and take over sibling applications · Advisory · supertokens/supertokens-core · GitHub

https://github.com/supertokens/supertokens-core/security/advisories/GHSA-4rf2-xqvf-8rcx

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 22:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 23:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 21:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 19:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-09 19:00 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-120149 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  9. 2026-11-09 18:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.9 CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-09 18:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-123800?
CVE-2026-123800 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 9, 2026. SuperTokens Core is an open source authentication server. From 6.0.0 until 6.0.24, 7.0.23, 8.0.7, 9.0.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.7, 9.3.5, 10.0.8, 10.1.9, 11.0.9, 11.1.4, 11.2.4, 11.3.8, 11.4.8, 12.0.11, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, and 12.3.1, Multitenancy.checkPermissionsForCreateOrUpdate in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-123800 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-123800 was published on November 9, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-123800 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-123800 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-123800?
CVE-2026-123800 has a CVSS base score of 9.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-123800?
A fix for CVE-2026-123800 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-123800

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-123800?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.