CVE-2026-11985

LOWPre-NVD 3.63.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 3.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 99% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
3.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 3.6Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

On the Zephyr ARM port, enabling the hardware FPU (CONFIG_FPU) forces the "Floating point ABI" choice, which defaults to CONFIG_FP_HARDABI. Both FP_HARDABI and FP_SOFTABI permit the compiler to emit hardware FP instructions in any function, even code that never uses floating-point types. However, the callee-saved FP registers (s16-s31 / d8-d15) are only saved and restored across a context switch when CONFIG_FPU_SHARING is enabled (arch/arm/core/cortex_m/swap_helper.S and arch/arm/core/cortex_a_r/swap_helper.S), and prior to this fix selecting an ABI did not enable FPU register sharing, which defaults off.

In a build that enables the FPU with the default ABI but leaves CONFIG_FPU_SHARING disabled, the kernel preserves no callee-saved FP register state across thread switches. The documented precondition for this "unshared" mode — that only a single thread ever executes FP instructions — is silently violated because the compiler may generate FP instructions in every thread.

Under CONFIG_USERSPACE, where threads are mutually isolated, this becomes an information-disclosure boundary crossing: a victim thread can leave secret-derived values in s16-s31, and a co-resident unprivileged thread can read those registers directly (FP register access is not privilege-gated), recovering data left behind by another thread. Without userspace the same defect causes cross-thread FP state corruption (a correctness fault). The leak is bounded to the 16 callee-saved single-precision registers and is opportunistic, so impact is low.

The fix makes FP_HARDABI and FP_SOFTABI select CONFIG_FPU_SHARING and tags every thread with K_FP_REGS at creation, so callee-saved FP state is always preserved across context switches whenever the compiler may emit FP instructions.

CVSS v3
3.6
EG Score
3.6(medium)
EG Risk
16(Track)
EG Risk 16/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity36% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 11, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-29 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-26 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-26 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-23 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-20 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-17 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-11 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-11 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-11 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-11 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-11 05:08 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-11985?
CVE-2026-11985 is a low vulnerability published on August 11, 2026. On the Zephyr ARM port, enabling the hardware FPU (CONFIGFPU) forces the "Floating point ABI" choice, which defaults to CONFIGFPHARDABI. Both FPHARDABI and FPSOFTABI permit the compiler to emit hardware FP instructions in any function, even code that never uses floating-point types. However, the…
When was CVE-2026-11985 disclosed?
CVE-2026-11985 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 11, 2026, with the most recent update on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-11985 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-11985 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 99.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-11985?
CVE-2026-11985 has a CVSS v3 base score of 3.6 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-11985?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-11985, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-11985

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-11985?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.