LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. From langgraph-sdk 0.4.0 until 0.4.6, and from langgraph 1.2.3 until 1.2.14 when RemoteGraph v3 streaming uses an affected langgraph-sdk version, the synchronous and asynchronous v3 stream get_tree and _fetch_state helpers interpolate caller-controlled assistant_id and thread_id values into authenticated GET request paths without using _quote_path_param. Relative path segments can therefore be normalized into another readable path on the configured server while retaining authentication headers. This issue is fixed in langgraph-sdk 0.4.6 and langgraph 1.2.14.
CVE-2026-118667
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-112474 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3fx2-cqw9-xr3c (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 20EG Risk 20/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 33rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 28, 2026
Last Modified
October 29, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026Unencoded identifiers in LangGraph SDK v3 streaming can redirect authenticated GET requests · Advisory · langchain-ai/langgraph · GitHub
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/security/advisories/GHSA-3fx2-cqw9-xr3clanggraph-sdk==0.4.6
Patch available: langchain-ai/langgraph sdk==0.4.6
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/releases/tag/sdk%3D%3D0.4.6langgraph==1.2.14
Patch available: langchain-ai/langgraph 1.2.14
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/releases/tag/1.2.14fix(sdk-py): percent-encode thread_id and assistant_id in thread stream requests
Patch available: langchain-ai/langgraph sdk==0.4.6 (PR #9213 merged 2026-10-06)
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/9213commit d89c7e100ec6 (langchain-ai/langgraph)
Patch available: langchain-ai/langgraph sdk==0.4.6 (contains commit d89c7e100ec6)
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/commit/d89c7e100ec6fc1512544d23b0a7c5169699ef3eVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-118667(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pip | langgraph @ 1.2.14 (fixes >= 1.2.3, < 1.2.14) | — | ghsa |
| pip | langgraph-sdk @ 0.4.6 (fixes >= 0.4.0, < 0.4.6) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| langgraph | 1.2.10 ... 1.2.9 (11 versions) |
| — |
| langgraph-sdk | 0.4.0 ... 0.4.5 (6 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3fx2-cqw9-xr3c · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-29 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-28 21:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 21:02 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-28 21:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-112474 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-28 20:58 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
3 shownPyPI:langgraph · PyPI:langgraph-sdk
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-118667?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-118667 published?
Is CVE-2026-118667 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-118667?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-118667?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-118667
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-118667?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.