CVE-2026-11811

LOWPre-NVD 3.73.7—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (32nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
3.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 3.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot.

The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable.

Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

CVSS v3
3.7
EG Score
3.7LOWmedium confidence
EG Risk
17
EG Risk 17/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity37% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
32nd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-03 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-30 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-27 11:05 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-22 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-19 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-17 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-14 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
Show 43 more
  1. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-08 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-05 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-29 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-24 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-21 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-18 18:10 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-15 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-12 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-12 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-10 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-10 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-10 23:09 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-11811?
CVE-2026-11811 is a low vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's startcoapclient() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was…
When was CVE-2026-11811 disclosed?
CVE-2026-11811 was first published on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-11811 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-11811 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (32nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-11811?
CVE-2026-11811 has a CVSS base score of 3.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-11811?
No fix for CVE-2026-11811 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-11811

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-11811?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.