CVE-2026-11743

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.66.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1% (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
6.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 6.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

The SF32LB MPI QSPI NOR flash driver (drivers/flash/flash_sf32lb_mpi_qspi_nor.c) validated the flash offset and length on its read and write paths with the test (offset + size) > data->size. Because offset is a signed off_t while size is unsigned, a negative offset is converted to a large unsigned value and the addition can wrap to a small result that passes the check. The read path then performs memcpy(dst, (void *)(data->base + offset), size) and the write path programs flash at offset and cache-invalidates data->base + offset, in both cases accessing memory outside the mapped flash window. The driver's erase path already rejected negative offsets, but read and write did not.

In builds with CONFIG_USERSPACE, flash_read and flash_write are syscalls whose verifiers validate the device object and the caller's buffer but deliberately delegate offset bounds checking to the driver. An unprivileged thread that has been granted access to this flash device can therefore call the syscall with a crafted negative offset and a buffer valid in its own memory domain, and reach the unchecked access.

The most direct impact is on the read path: by choosing a negative offset and matching size, an attacker slides the memcpy source below the flash base and copies arbitrary CPU-addressable memory into its own buffer, disclosing memory it is not authorized to read. The write path additionally allows programming flash at an out-of-range address and invalidating an attacker-chosen cache range, affecting integrity and availability. Reachability requires userspace to be enabled and the raw flash device object to be granted to an untrusted thread.

The fix replaces the check with qspi_nor_range_is_valid(), which rejects negative offsets and performs the bound comparison in overflow-safe 64-bit arithmetic on both paths, and additionally adds an SRAM DMA bounce buffer plus source/destination overlap rejection to prevent a separate DMA bus-hang condition.

CVSS v3
6.6
EG Score
6.6MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
30
EG Risk 30/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity66% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.6 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 7, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026
Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Missing negative-offset/overflow check in SF32LB MPI QSPI NOR flash driver allows out-of-bounds read and write · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-c6wh-gwg4-fj5j
GitHub commit

commit 909eb5687503 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 909eb5687503 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/909eb568750304d68ea481d1b56a489ae670bdae

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-29 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-09-27 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-09-25 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-23 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-22 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-20 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-19 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-09-18 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-17 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-13 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-09-12 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-09-11 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-09-09 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-07 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-06 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-05 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  27. 2026-09-01 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  29. 2026-08-31 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  31. 2026-08-30 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  33. 2026-08-29 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  35. 2026-08-27 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  37. 2026-08-26 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  40. 2026-08-24 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-23 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  43. 2026-08-22 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  45. 2026-08-21 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  47. 2026-08-18 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  49. 2026-08-17 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-16 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  52. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  53. 2026-08-15 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  55. 2026-08-14 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  57. 2026-08-12 18:36 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  59. 2026-08-11 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  61. 2026-08-10 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-10 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-09 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  65. 2026-08-08 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  67. 2026-08-07 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-07 21:22 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.6 MEDIUM
  69. 2026-08-07 21:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-11743?
CVE-2026-11743 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 7, 2026. The SF32LB MPI QSPI NOR flash driver (drivers/flash/flashsf32lbmpiqspinor.c) validated the flash offset and length on its read and write paths with the test (offset + size) > data->size. Because offset is a signed off_t while size is unsigned, a negative offset is converted to a large unsigned…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-11743 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-11743 was published on August 7, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-11743 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-11743 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-11743?
CVE-2026-11743 has a CVSS base score of 6.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-11743?
A fix for CVE-2026-11743 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-11743

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-11743?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.