FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1, an authenticated API-enabled user with uType=1 who possesses both the user's API token and the global FOG API token can use PUT /fog/storagenode/{id}/edit to modify Storage Node user, pass, and ftppath fields because the API validates the credentials but does not enforce an administrator-only role. With storage replication enabled and a usable Storage Node, FOGImageReplicator interpolates those fields into an lftp command executed through proc_open() by the root-running service, allowing the low-privileged user to execute commands as root. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1.
CVE-2026-116778
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-112150 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0% × 40%No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 40th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 28, 2026
Last Modified
October 29, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 28, 20261.6.0-RC-1
Patch available: FOGProject/fogproject 1.6.0-RC-1
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.6.0-RC-11.5.10.2253
Patch available: FOGProject/fogproject 1.5.10.2253
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.5.10.2253commit aeda5bc536e3 (FOGProject/fogproject)
Patch available: FOGProject/fogproject 1.6.0-RC-1 (contains commit aeda5bc536e3)
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/aeda5bc536e3eec0200366d6b109a66798abc438commit 3098e4423588 (FOGProject/fogproject)
Patch available: FOGProject/fogproject 1.5.10.2253 (contains commit 3098e4423588)
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/3098e4423588951d8f0cedac79b9b102f036761eGate the API on uType and stop building the lftp command in a shell (GHSA-2hqx-5ffg-w4c3)
Patch available: FOGProject/fogproject 1.5.10.2253 (PR #1001 merged 2026-08-05)
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/pull/1001Authenticated low-privileged API user can modify Storage Nodes and reach root command execution · Advisory · FOGProject/fogproject · GitHub
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/security/advisories/GHSA-2hqx-5ffg-w4c3Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-112150 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-28 15:54 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
- 2026-10-28 15:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78 · CWE-862
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-116778?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-116778 published?
Is CVE-2026-116778 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-116778?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-116778?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-116778
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-116778?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.