YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the filtertags action, which echoes attacker-controlled token values without output encoding. Anonymous attackers can inject markup via action-attribute parameters that bypasses the allow_raw_html gate, executing JavaScript for every page viewer.
CVE-2026-116203
MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.16.1Trending — 4 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 6.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.1; sources differ by 0.0.
Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Also known asEUVD-2026-109461 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2cq3-2fgh-69rq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists yeswiki versions before 4.7.0 as affected, and yeswiki versions 4.7.0 as unaffected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 6.1
- EG Score
- 6.1MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 43EG Risk 43/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity61% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 25, 2026
Last Modified
October 26, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 25, 2026No fix on record yet. Sources: github.
Web page
YesWiki before 4.7.0 Stored XSS via filtertags Action Parameters | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/yeswiki-before-4.7.0-stored-xss-via-filtertags-action-parametersGitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)
Stored XSS via `filtertags` action parameters (bypasses raw-HTML protection) · Advisory · YesWiki/yeswiki · GitHub
https://github.com/YesWiki/yeswiki/security/advisories/GHSA-f53x-3gqx-xq76Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-116203(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-26 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2cq3-2fgh-69rq · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-10-26 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2cq3-2fgh-69rq · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 13:27 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.1 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-25 13:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-116203?
CVE-2026-116203 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 25, 2026. YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the filtertags action, which echoes attacker-controlled token values without output encoding. Anonymous attackers can inject markup via action-attribute parameters that bypasses the allowrawhtml gate, executing JavaScript…
When was CVE-2026-116203 made public?
CVE-2026-116203 was made public on October 9, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-116203 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-116203 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-116203?
CVE-2026-116203 has a CVSS base score of 6.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-116203?
No fix for CVE-2026-116203 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists yeswiki versions before 4.7.0 as affected, and yeswiki versions 4.7.0 as unaffected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-116203 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-116203
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-116203?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.