CVE-2026-116017

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-109275 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2hv3-q586-pf3c (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Xiaozhi-esp32-server before 0.9.8 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the manager-api DeviceController.getAddressBook handler that allows authenticated users to read other users' device address books. Attackers with a normal or self-registered account can request /device/address-book/{macAddress} with another user's device MAC to obtain contact MACs, aliases, call permissions, and owner user IDs.

CVSS v3
4.3
EG Score
4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
19
EG Risk 19/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity43% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_release, github_commit.
Web page

Xiaozhi-esp32-server before 0.9.8 IDOR via device address-book endpoint | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/xiaozhi-esp32-server-before-0.9.8-idor-via-device-address-book-endpoint
Web page

xiaozhi-esp32-server manager-api device address-book IDOR, any normal user reads another user's device contact list - HackMD

https://hackmd.io/@hieuPenguinnn/xiaozhi-esp32-server-address-book-idor
GitHub release Patch Available

v0.9.8

Patch available: xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server v0.9.8

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/releases/tag/v0.9.8
GitHub pull request Patch Available

修掉通讯录的两处越权(读 + 写)

Patch available: xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server v0.9.8 (PR #3460 merged 2026-10-23)

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/pull/3460
Web page

Security vulnerability in xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server: please review the report and fix · Issue #3459 · xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server · GitHub

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/issues/3459
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit d4ff9c5c17cb (xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server)

Patch available: xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server v0.9.8 (contains commit d4ff9c5c17cb)

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/commit/d4ff9c5c17cbd82ec98a2a6bb4f82a07c1be0f03
Web page

xiaozhi-esp32-server/main/manager-api/src/main/resources/mapper/device/DeviceAddressBookDao.xml at v0.9.7 · xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server · GitHub

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/blob/v0.9.7/main/manager-api/src/main/resources/mapper/device/DeviceAddressBookDao.xml#L5-L10
Web page

xiaozhi-esp32-server/main/manager-api/src/main/java/xiaozhi/modules/device/controller/DeviceController.java at v0.9.7 · xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server · GitHub

https://github.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-server/blob/v0.9.7/main/manager-api/src/main/java/xiaozhi/modules/device/controller/DeviceController.java#L173-L178

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-116017(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-26 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hv3-q586-pf3c · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  4. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 11:45 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
  9. 2026-10-24 11:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-116017?
CVE-2026-116017 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 24, 2026. Xiaozhi-esp32-server before 0.9.8 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the manager-api DeviceController.getAddressBook handler that allows authenticated users to read other users' device address books. Attackers with a normal or self-registered account can request…
When was CVE-2026-116017 made public?
CVE-2026-116017 was made public on October 22, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 24, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-116017 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-116017 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-116017?
CVE-2026-116017 has a CVSS base score of 4.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-116017?
A fix for CVE-2026-116017 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-116017 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-116017

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-116017?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.