CVE-2026-115722

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.16.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-23. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-108710 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pqc7-7g6c-cw4g (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists diegonehab rply versions up to and including 1.1.4 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

RPly through 1.1.4 contains an improper array index validation vulnerability in ply_read_header_property() that accepts list as a list property's length or value type. Attackers can supply a crafted PLY file that makes ply_read_list_property() call an out-of-bounds handler, crashing ASCII parsing or corrupting memory in binary parsing.

CVSS v3
6.1
EG Score
6.1MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
28
EG Risk 28/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity61% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 23, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

RPly through 1.1.4 Out-of-Bounds Function Pointer Index via PLY Header | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rply-through-1.1.4-out-of-bounds-function-pointer-index-via-ply-header
Web page

RPly PLY reader: a list property whose length or value type is declared as `list` drives an out-of-bounds index into the handler table and an indirect call through the wrong function pointer - HackMD

https://hackmd.io/@haindpwn/rply-property-list-type-confusion
Web page

RPly PLY reader: a list property whose length or value type is declared as `list` drives an out-of-bounds index into the handler table and an indirect call through the wrong function pointer · Issue #10 · diegonehab/rply · GitHub

https://github.com/diegonehab/rply/issues/10
Web page

rply/rply.c at 75639e3f12755ca64559d45a4a0bcffc52e04ef8 · diegonehab/rply · GitHub

https://github.com/diegonehab/rply/blob/75639e3f12755ca64559d45a4a0bcffc52e04ef8/rply.c#L821-L848
Web page

rply/rply.c at 75639e3f12755ca64559d45a4a0bcffc52e04ef8 · diegonehab/rply · GitHub

https://github.com/diegonehab/rply/blob/75639e3f12755ca64559d45a4a0bcffc52e04ef8/rply.c#L1228-L1251

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-115722(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 20:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 20:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqc7-7g6c-cw4g · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  8. 2026-10-23 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-23 11:51 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.1 MEDIUM
  10. 2026-10-23 11:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-115722?
CVE-2026-115722 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 23, 2026. RPly through 1.1.4 contains an improper array index validation vulnerability in plyreadheaderproperty() that accepts list as a list property's length or value type. Attackers can supply a crafted PLY file that makes plyreadlistproperty() call an out-of-bounds handler, crashing ASCII parsing or…
When was CVE-2026-115722 made public?
CVE-2026-115722 was made public on October 21, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 23, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-115722 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-115722 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-115722?
CVE-2026-115722 has a CVSS base score of 6.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-115722?
No fix for CVE-2026-115722 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists diegonehab rply versions up to and including 1.1.4 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-115722 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-115722

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-115722?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.