CVE-2026-114604

HIGHCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asGHSA-c4qx-w738-7hr3 (GitHub Security Advisories)

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability — apply it.

GraphQL Tools: Prototype pollution in mergeIncrementalResult via non-primitive path segments

Report metadata

| Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Package | @graphql-tools/utils (npm, pkg:github/ardatan/graphql-tools) | | Repository | https://github.com/ardatan/graphql-tools | | Component | mergeIncrementalResult / setObjectKeyPath (packages/utils/src/mergeIncrementalResult.ts) | | Vulnerability class | Prototype pollution (via unvalidated object path traversal) | | Verified against | Source read at 134d67ae36a559651f43ec7fe4a9da76f4a00c2b; master HEAD ccca0ff0dc8ea20726fd116b2f19a38709c30e62; published npm builds 10.10.0, 10.10.1, 11.0.0, 12.0.0, 12.0.1 | | Affected versions | @graphql-tools/utils >= 10.10.1 through the scanned 12.0.0 source; introduced by fbb58b51c4993ba9680ce6c2ef7203ab3a142713 ("remove dset dependency"). 12.0.1 also reproduces. 10.10.0 does not. | | API surface | Public, documented export (packages/utils/src/index.ts:55) | | Affected in default configuration | Yes — no options are involved; the forbidden-key check in setObjectKeyPath is the only defense and it is on by default |

Summary

mergeIncrementalResult merges an incremental GraphQL response part into an accumulated execution result by walking ['data', ...incrementalResult.path] and assigning at the resolved location. setObjectKeyPath tries to reject dangerous segments with strict string equality against '__proto__', 'constructor' and 'prototype' (lines 50-52 and 60-62), but it never validates that a path segment is a primitive string or number. A JSON path segment such as ["__proto__"] is an array object, so ["__proto__"] !== '__proto__' and the guard passes; the very next statement does current[key], whose ToPropertyKey coercion turns that array into the string key "__proto__" and resolves Object.prototype. The following, innocuous-looking segment is then assigned directly onto Object.prototype.

In a consuming app, incrementalResult is the response part being merged — data parsed from an upstream @defer/@stream multipart or incremental-delivery response from another GraphQL server or transport. The ExecutionResult TypeScript annotation is not a runtime check, so a malicious, compromised, or MITM'd upstream can choose the path value and therefore choose global prototype keys and values in the gateway or client process.

Comparable paths through the same helper, for contrast:

  • Plain string segment "__proto__" -> blocked by strict equality, lines 50-52 (confirmed by a control case in testing)
  • Array segment ["__proto__"] -> unsafe: passes the guard at lines 50-52, then coerced to the __proto__ key at lines 53-57
  • Same operation in 10.10.0 and earlier, which used dset -> not exploitable (0/5 attack payloads succeeded)

Impact

A malicious incremental GraphQL response can add arbitrary properties with attacker-chosen values to Object.prototype in the consuming Node.js process. Because every plain object inherits from it, this can change authorization and configuration checks and the behavior of unrelated code elsewhere in the process — a networked PoC set Object.prototype.isAdmin = true and Object.prototype.ownerEmail, after which a consumer-style check opts.isAdmin === true on a freshly created {} returned true.

The delta over the safe behaviour: without this traversal flaw, a hostile upstream response can only influence the GraphQL data returned to the caller — a bounded, in-band effect. With path: [["__proto__"], "isAdmin"], the write lands on Object.prototype, escaping the response object entirely and affecting objects created later and code that never touches the response.

Scoring note: this report deliberately carries no CVSS vector. No score was produced for it, and exploitability depends on the consuming application's data flow — specifically whether it merges incremental results from an upstream it does not control, and how much it relies on inherited defaults. Consumers who are not affected: anything on @graphql-tools/utils 10.10.0 or earlier (the dset-based implementation blocked all tested payloads); processes that freeze Object.prototype; and consumers that runtime-validate incremental path segments to primitives before calling the helper. Note also that graphql-tools' own production code does not call mergeIncrementalResult directly — it is exported for consumers assembling incremental transport results.

Preconditions

  • The consumer calls the public mergeIncrementalResult helper on incremental payloads received from another GraphQL server or other untrusted transport. No special options are needed.
  • The incremental payload is not runtime-validated to contain only primitive string/number path segments before the call. This is the default: packages/utils/src/index.ts:55 exports the helper directly, with no runtime validation and no documented warning, and the behaviour is not documented as a caller responsibility.
  • The attacker can return a malformed incremental path value — i.e. controls, has compromised, or can MITM the upstream subgraph/transport.
  • The process has not frozen Object.prototype.

This requires no non-standard usage, monkey-patching, or unusual configuration: the documented happy path of the exported helper is affected. The only defense present in the code is the strict-equality forbidden-key check added at lines 50 and 60, which itself shows the author treats these path segments as untrusted input. No documentation warning about the trust requirement was found (documentation review is limited to the exported symbol at packages/utils/src/index.ts:55; a broader docs audit is not verified).

Data flow

  • Source — the attacker-controlled incrementalResult.path, taken from the object passed to the public merge helper, is spread into the key path: const path = ['data', ...(incrementalResult.path ?? [])]; (packages/utils/src/mergeIncrementalResult.ts:12).
  • Propagation — setObjectKeyPath compares the unvalidated segment against the forbidden strings with === only; a non-primitive segment is never equal to any of them, so it passes unchanged (packages/utils/src/mergeIncrementalResult.ts:48-52).
  • Sink — current[key] performs ToPropertyKey coercion, turning the array segment ["__proto__"] into the key "__proto__" and resolving Object.prototype; the following segment is then assigned on that resolved object: current[finalKey] = existingValue != null ? mergeDeep([existingValue, value]) : value (packages/utils/src/mergeIncrementalResult.ts:53-57, sink at :59-64).
  • Reachability — the entry point is the public API mergeIncrementalResult({ incrementalResult, executionResult }), exported directly at packages/utils/src/index.ts:55 for consumers that assemble incremental transport results. Testing confirmed the data, items (@stream) and recursive incremental[] branches are all affected.

Vulnerable code

packages/utils/src/mergeIncrementalResult.ts, lines 12-64 at 134d67ae36a559651f43ec7fe4a9da76f4a00c2b (extract; the ... markers are elisions of intervening lines, not source text):

const path = ['data', ...(incrementalResult.path ?? [])];
...
const key = keyPath[i];
if (key === '__proto__' || key === 'constructor' || key === 'prototype') return;
if (current[key] == null) current[key] = ...;
current = current[key];
...
current[finalKey] = existingValue != null ? mergeDeep([existingValue, value]) : value;
  • The guard line (key === '__proto__' || ..., lines 50-52) is the intended defense; it is safe only for primitive string segments.
  • current = current[key] (lines 53-57) is where a non-primitive segment is coerced into a forbidden key — this is the traversal that escapes the response object.
  • current[finalKey] = ... (lines 59-64) is the sink: the write that lands on Object.prototype.
  • The final-segment check at lines 60-62 repeats the same strict-equality pattern and has the same weakness.

Reproduction

Verified — reproduced dynamically, not only by inspection. Three independent reproductions were run:

  • Source level. packages/utils/src/{mergeIncrementalResult,mergeDeep,helpers}.ts were copied from master unchanged except for retargeting relative .js import specifiers to .ts, then run under node --experimental-strip-types --test. 5/5 tests pass, including a control proving that the plain-string "__proto__" segment is blocked, while the payload {"path":[["__proto__"],"polluted"],"data":{"pwned":true}} sets Object.prototype.polluted = {pwned: true} and leaves the executionResult as {"data":{}}. The data, items (@stream) and recursive incremental[] branches are all affected.
  • Published artifacts. The same attacks were run against the real npm dist builds: 10.10.0 = 0/5 attacks succeed (still uses dset, which blocks it); 10.10.1, 11.0.0, 12.0.0 and 12.0.1 = 5/5 attacks succeed. This differential confirms the affected range and that fbb58b51c4993ba9680ce6c2ef7203ab3a142713 introduced the issue; that commit is still the last one touching the file on master, so HEAD (ccca0ff0dc8ea20726fd116b2f19a38709c30e62) is unfixed.
  • Real call site over the network. A local HTTP server returned a spec-shaped multipart/mixed @defer response whose deferred patches carry path: [["__proto__"],"isAdmin"]. The client only JSON.parse()d the chunks and called the public mergeIncrementalResult(). Afterwards Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Object.prototype) contains isAdmin and ownerEmail, ({}).isAdmin === true, and a consumer-style check opts.isAdmin === true on a fresh {} returns true.

Minimal standalone reproduction:

import { mergeIncrementalResult } from '@graphql-tools/utils';

const executionResult = { data: {} }; const incrementalResult = JSON.parse('{"path":[["__proto__"],"polluted"],"data":"yes"}'); mergeIncrementalResult({ incrementalResult, executionResult }); console.log(({} as any).polluted); // expected vulnerable output: yes delete (Object.prototype as any).polluted;

Steps: run the above under Node against the built @graphql-tools/utils package, then inspect a freshly created object after the merge.

  • Expected: the helper rejects the malformed path; ({} as any).polluted remains undefined and no property is added to Object.prototype.
  • Actual: the write lands on Object.prototype; ({} as any).polluted is "yes" on a fresh object, while executionResult is left as {"data":{}}.

Suggested remediation

Validate the type of every path segment before it is used for property access, so that only primitive string/number keys ever reach bracket access — and compare against the forbidden names only after that validation.

function isSafeKey(key: unknown): key is string | number {
  if (typeof key !== 'string' && typeof key !== 'number') return false;
  return key !== '__proto__' && key !== 'constructor' && key !== 'prototype';
}

// walking segment const key = keyPath[i]; if (!isSafeKey(key)) return; if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(current, key) || current[key] == null) { current[key] = ...; } current = current[key];

// final segment if (!isSafeKey(finalKey)) return; current[finalKey] = existingValue != null ? mergeDeep([existingValue, value]) : value;

A stronger variant, if it fits the project's style: build intermediate containers with Object.create(null) and use own-property access (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call) throughout the walk, so an inherited property can never be resolved or written even if a future guard is missed.

Notes:

  • The final-segment check (lines 60-62) needs the same treatment as the walking check (lines 50-52); patching only one leaves the other reachable.
  • All three branches that reach this sink — data, items (@stream) and the recursive incremental[] handling — are affected by the same helper and are fixed together by validating in setObjectKeyPath.
  • Nothing outside this helper appears to need changing: 10.10.0 and earlier, which delegated to dset, were not exploitable by any of the tested payloads, so the regression is confined to the hand-rolled traversal added in fbb58b51c4993ba9680ce6c2ef7203ab3a142713.
  • Whether a released fix or backport policy is wanted for the 10.x and 11.x lines is the maintainers' call; no fix, advisory, or upstream issue currently exists for this.

Suggested regression test alongside the existing tests for mergeIncrementalResult (exact spec file path: unknown — not identified in this review): assert that merging {"path":[["__proto__"],"polluted"],"data":"yes"} leaves ({} as any).polluted undefined and Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Object.prototype) unchanged, with a paired control asserting the plain-string "__proto__" segment is still rejected, and equivalents for an object-valued segment (e.g. {"toString":() => "__proto__"}-style coercion) and for the items/incremental[] branches.

Resolution

Fixed in @graphql-tools/[email protected], which is published on npm. setObjectKeyPath rejects a path unless every segment is a primitive string or number, and still blocks __proto__, constructor, and prototype. Upgrade to >=12.0.2.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 22, 2026

Last Modified

October 22, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-114604(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@graphql-tools/utils @ 12.0.2 (fixes >= 10.10.1, <= 12.0.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c4qx-w738-7hr3 · GitHub severity HIGH
  2. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-22 17:21 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-114604?
CVE-2026-114604 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 22, 2026. GraphQL Tools: Prototype pollution in mergeIncrementalResult via non-primitive path segments Report metadata | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Package | @graphql-tools/utils (npm, pkg:github/ardatan/graphql-tools) | | Repository | https://github.com/ardatan/graphql-tools | | Component |…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-114604 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-114604 was published on October 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-114604?
A fixed version for CVE-2026-114604 is listed under Patch Availability on this page: update to the version listed for your package. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-114604 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-114604

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-114604?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.