Baserow before 2.3.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to read field values from other workspaces via the unique_row_values API endpoint. Attackers can enumerate sequential field IDs to retrieve up to 100 distinct cell values per field from tables in workspaces they do not belong to.
CVE-2026-113359
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-20. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0% × 40%No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 19th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 20, 2026
Last Modified
October 21, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 20, 2026Baserow before 2.3.0 Cross-Workspace Data Disclosure via unique_row_values Endpoint | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/baserow-before-2.3.0-cross-workspace-data-disclosure-via-unique-row-values-endpointbaserow/backend/src/baserow/contrib/database/api/fields/views.py at 2.2.2 · baserow/baserow · GitHub
https://github.com/baserow/baserow/blob/2.2.2/backend/src/baserow/contrib/database/api/fields/views.py2.3.0
Patch available: baserow/baserow 2.3.0
https://github.com/baserow/baserow/releases/tag/2.3.0commit 6884c1a49adb (baserow/baserow)
Patch available: baserow/baserow 2.3.0 (contains commit 6884c1a49adb)
https://github.com/baserow/baserow/commit/6884c1a49adb5eb0a32de1220e6d9f99e9d97c1fBaserow Cross-workspace read of similar field cell values (IDOR) in Baserow · Advisory · baserow/baserow · GitHub
https://github.com/baserow/baserow/security/advisories/GHSA-r8cf-4rgr-x5cvSecurity: Cross-Workspace IDOR in UniqueRowValueFieldView - Missing Permission Check · Issue #4870 · baserow/baserow · GitHub
https://github.com/baserow/baserow/issues/4870Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-113359(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fm4f-3f67-2hgv · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-21 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fm4f-3f67-2hgv · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 15:49 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-20 15:47 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-113359?
When was CVE-2026-113359 made public?
Is CVE-2026-113359 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-113359?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-113359?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-113359
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-113359?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.