A flaw has been found in subhajitkhan online-clinic-management-system up to e9ee77a8827a1446220fa07ee693dc4d9a29a578. The affected element is the function echo of the file doctorregistration.php of the component Doctor Registration. Executing a manipulation of the argument doc_name can lead to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-112092
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 35EG Risk 35/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 19, 2026
Last Modified
October 19, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026GitHub - subhajitkhan/online-clinic-management-system: Aim of this project is to develop a dynamic web based application using PHP, HTML, CSS,Bootstrap, JavaScript,Jquery, and MySQL to provide appointment to the patients according to doctors’ availability. The main three modules in our project are Patient module, Doctor Module and Admin module. Patients have to register themselves so that they can login into our system. Then patient can select department as well as doctor according to their ch...
GitHub - subhajitkhan/online-clinic-management-system: Aim of this project is to develop a dynamic web based application using PHP, HTML, CSS,Bootstrap, JavaScript,Jquery, and MySQL to provide appointment to the patients according to doctors’ availability. The main three modules in our project are Patient module, Doctor Module and Admin module. Patients have to register themselves so that they can login into our system. Then patient can select department as well as doctor according to their choice. If the doctor is free at that day, patient will get appointment. Patient can also cancel appointment. Similarly doctors can also register themselves and have to wait for admin’s approval. After that they can see their appointments, patient’s details etc. Admins have to register themselves explicitly through database. After login admins can approve doctor’s availability or unavailability and also can view appointments, doctors list, feedback and reports. The USP of our project is, patients can chat with respective doctors. · GitHub
https://github.com/subhajitkhan/online-clinic-management-system/Stored XSS in doctor registration executes in the directory view · Issue #6 · subhajitkhan/online-clinic-management-system · GitHub
https://github.com/subhajitkhan/online-clinic-management-system/issues/6Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-112092(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 15× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-19 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r6vv-66v3-wffr · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 17:25 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
- 2026-10-19 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r6vv-66v3-wffr · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 16:57 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v4 → 5.3
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r6vv-66v3-wffr · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 08:25 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
- 2026-10-19 07:49 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-19 07:48 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-112092?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-112092 published?
Is CVE-2026-112092 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-112092?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-112092?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-112092
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-112092?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.