CVE-2026-111753

MEDIUMCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asGHSA-jfgx-762w-99vr (GitHub Security Advisories)

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability — apply it.

@angular/common: XSRF Token Leakage via URL Parsing Discrepancy in Angular HTTP Client (Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-66035)

An incomplete fix for GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37 (CVE-2025-66035) in @angular/common's HTTP Client (HttpClient) allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) tokens to be leaked to attacker-controlled cross-origin domains when requests use URLs that exploit parsing discrepancies between regular expressions and the browser's WHATWG URL parser.

Technical Description

To address CVE-2025-66035, xsrfInterceptorFn introduced a regular expression (const ABSOLUTE_URL_REGEX = /^(?:https?:)?\/\//i) to detect and skip absolute and protocol-relative URLs before attaching the X-XSRF-TOKEN header.

However, browsers resolve request URLs passed to fetch() and XMLHttpRequest.open() using the WHATWG URL parser. For http: and https: schemes, the WHATWG URL standard performs several normalizations prior to resolving the authority/origin: * Backslashes (\) are treated as forward slashes (/) — e.g., /\evil.example/x, \\evil.example/x, \/evil.example/x, https:\\evil.example/x, https:/\evil.example/x. * Leading and trailing C0 control characters and spaces (<= 0x20) are stripped — e.g., ' //evil.example/x', '\0//evil.example/x', '\x1f//evil.example/x'. * ASCII tab (\t), newline (\n), and carriage return (\r) characters are removed anywhere in the input — e.g., '/\t/evil.example/x', '/\n/evil.example/x', 'htt\tps://evil.example/x'.

Because these URLs do not match /^(?:https?:)?\/\//i, xsrfInterceptorFn treats them as relative same-origin URLs and attaches the X-XSRF-TOKEN header, while the browser resolves and dispatches the request to the cross-origin host (evil.example).

Note: Angular 21.0.3+ and 22.x replaced the regular expression with a WHATWG new URL(req.url, locationOrigin) origin comparison in #65683 and were already unaffected. However, the 20.3.x LTS branch retained the regular expression until 20.3.34.

Impact

The token leakage bypasses Angular's built-in XSRF protection on affected versions, allowing an attacker to capture the user's valid X-XSRF-TOKEN header if their server permits the request and custom header via CORS. Once obtained, the attacker can perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks against the victim user's session.

Attack Preconditions

  • The victim's Angular application must have XSRF protection enabled (enabled by default in HttpClient).
  • The attacker must be able to make the application send a state-changing HTTP request (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH) to a URL they control (such as /\attacker.example/api or //attacker.example/api).

Patches

The issue is resolved by parsing and comparing the request URL's origin against the application's current origin using the standard URL constructor (new URL(req.url, locationOrigin)).

* 21.0.3 (and all 22.x releases) * 20.3.34

Workarounds

If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version: * Validate and normalize outgoing request URLs using new URL(url, window.location.origin) and verify that parsedUrl.origin === window.location.origin before passing dynamic URLs to mutating HttpClient requests. * Avoid passing untrusted or user-controlled URLs to HttpClient mutating methods.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 20, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-111753(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@angular/common @ 21.0.3 (fixes >= 21.0.0, < 21.0.3)—ghsa
npm@angular/common @ 20.3.34 (fixes >= 20.0.0, < 20.3.34)—ghsa
npm@angular/common—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfgx-762w-99vr · GitHub severity MODERATE
  2. 2026-10-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 21:22 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-111753?
CVE-2026-111753 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 20, 2026. @angular/common: XSRF Token Leakage via URL Parsing Discrepancy in Angular HTTP Client (Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-66035) An incomplete fix for GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37 (CVE-2025-66035) in @angular/common's HTTP Client (HttpClient) allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) tokens to be leaked to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-111753 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-111753 was published on October 20, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-111753?
A fixed version for CVE-2026-111753 is listed under Patch Availability on this page: update to the version listed for your package. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-111753 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-111753

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-111753?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.