CVE-2026-111751

HIGHCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asGHSA-57xq-rjx2-v5xh (GitHub Security Advisories)

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability — apply it.

@angular/router: Denial of Service via RouterLink Query Parameter Retention in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8) and RouterLink directives are rendered with queryParamsHandling: 'merge' or 'preserve', configured either per link or globally via defaultQueryParamsHandling.

Starting in v21.2.0 (angular/angular#66181), RouterLink internals were refactored to use signals, introducing a computed signal (_urlTree) that cached the returned UrlTree instance on the directive. Because each rendered link maintains an active RouterLink instance for the entire duration of the request lifecycle, the computed signal permanently pinned the UrlTree and its associated query parameter dictionary in the heap until the SSR response completed.

When query parameter handling is set to 'merge' or 'preserve', each link copies the incoming request's query parameters into its own UrlTree. During SSR, memory consumption scales multiplicatively:

$$\text{Heap Retention} \approx (\text{Number of affected links}) \times (\text{Size of parsed query parameter map})$$

Because parsed JavaScript objects and property dictionaries require substantially more heap space than the raw query string—particularly when property names trigger dense array allocations under V8 property-storage heuristics—an attacker can supply oversized query strings to amplify heap consumption by orders of magnitude per in-flight request.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js old-space heap with modest concurrent request volume, terminating the SSR worker with an unrecoverable JavaScript heap out of memory fatal crash.

* Numeric Names Not Required: Numeric query parameter names trigger larger V8 property-storage allocations (~558 KB per parsed dictionary in tests vs. ~197 KB for non-numeric equivalents), lowering the concurrency threshold needed for a crash. However, non-numeric query parameters also produce significant heap amplification and can exhaust worker memory with proportionally higher concurrency. * Client-side SPAs Unaffected: Pure client-side Angular applications (Single Page Applications without SSR) are not vulnerable, as local browser memory consumption does not cross a security boundary.

Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations

An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met:

  • SSR Enabled: The application runs in a Server-Side Rendering environment powered by Node.js / V8.
  • Merged or Preserved Query Parameters: RouterLink elements rendered during SSR use queryParamsHandling: 'merge' or 'preserve', either bound explicitly on links or configured application-wide via withRouterConfig({ defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge' }).
  • Upstream Proxy Forwards Long Request Lines: Reverse proxies or load balancers (e.g., Nginx, AWS ALB, Cloudflare) forward long query strings to the Node.js application rather than rejecting them at the edge. (For example, Nginx's default 8 KB large_client_header_buffers limit rejects 16 KB request lines unless explicitly increased).
  • Overlapping Renders: Because retained memory is freed once each request completes, multiple concurrent requests must be processed simultaneously in the same Node.js worker instance (such as pages awaiting asynchronous data fetching, route resolvers, or external API calls during SSR).

Exploit Payload Example

An attacker issues concurrent HTTP requests containing dense query parameters to an SSR page that renders multiple merged links:

GET /products?0&17&34&51&68&85&...&48042 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

Patches

The issue is resolved by removing persistent UrlTree retention from RouterLink (angular/angular#70953). RouterLink now tracks route dependencies directly in reactiveHref and discards intermediate UrlTree instances immediately after computing the serialized href string. The urlTree getter and click handlers compute UrlTree instances on demand.

As a result, intermediate query parameter maps are short-lived allocations collected during young-generation GC scavenges rather than remaining pinned in the heap for the lifetime of the request, restoring the memory profile of Angular 21.1 and earlier.

Patched versions: * 22.2.1 * 21.2.25

Versions prior to 21.2.0 (including Angular 20.x LTS and 21.1.x) do not retain UrlTree instances in RouterLink and are not vulnerable to this issue.

Workarounds & Mitigations

If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations:

  • Avoid 'merge' and 'preserve' on Server-Rendered Links:
Remove defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge' (or 'preserve') from global configuration. Explicitly bind only the specific query parameters each link requires (e.g., [queryParams]="{ filter: filter() }"). Even on patched versions, this practice prevents unnecessary request-derived parameter propagation into generated DOM markup.
  • Limit Query String Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware:
Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long query strings (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes).

Alternatively, reject oversized query strings in Node.js before Angular SSR handles the request:

// server.ts (before Angular SSR handler)
   app.use((req, res, next) => {
     const queryIndex = req.url.indexOf('?');
     if (queryIndex !== -1 && req.url.length - queryIndex > 2048) {
       res.status(414).send('URI Too Long');
       return;
     }
     next();
   });
  • Increase Node.js Old Space:
Increasing --max-old-space-size (e.g., to 2048 MB or 4096 MB) increases the memory headroom and the concurrency threshold required to exhaust memory, though it does not fully eliminate vulnerability under sustained traffic.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 20, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-111751(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@angular/router @ 22.2.1 (fixes >= 22.0.0, < 22.2.1)—ghsa
npm@angular/router @ 21.2.25 (fixes >= 21.2.0, < 21.2.25)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-57xq-rjx2-v5xh · GitHub severity HIGH
  2. 2026-10-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 18:21 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-111751?
CVE-2026-111751 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 20, 2026. @angular/router: Denial of Service via RouterLink Query Parameter Retention in Server-Side Rendering (SSR) A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8) and RouterLink directives are rendered with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-111751 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-111751 was published on October 20, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-111751?
A fixed version for CVE-2026-111751 is listed under Patch Availability on this page: update to the version listed for your package. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-111751 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-111751

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-111751?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.