在 openGauss-server的 src/common/backend/utils/adt/genfile.cpp 模块中，内置函数 pg_read_binary_file_blocks() 存在权限校验逻辑缺陷。该函数在入口处仅校验了起始块号（startBlockNum）和块数量（blockCount）的范围，随后直接调用底层文件读取例程 ReadBinaryFileBlocksFirstCall()。该底层例程仅执行了路径规范化检查以及针对 .. 路径遍历和数据目录边界的基本检查，缺失了对调用者数据库权限（如 SELECT 权限）的校验。此外，辅助函数 is_row_data_file() 也仅用于识别文件形态，未包含权限检查。因此，任何拥有普通数据库连接权限的用户，只要能够通过 pg_relation_filepath() 等函数获取到目标表的底层关系文件路径（例如压缩数据的 _compress 文件路径），即可无需具备该表的 SELECT 权限，直接读取表数据的二进制块。 此漏洞影响此前3.0.0到6.0.0间的所有版本及补丁版，并在7.0.0-LTS版本修复。修复patch详见：https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-server/pull/9374。
CVE-2026-111439
MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3Trending — 4 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
4.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 4.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (openGauss Community) lists openGauss-server versions 7.0.0-LTS as unaffected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 16th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 19, 2026
Last Modified
October 19, 2026
References (1)
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-111439(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-19 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cr5j-x763-5676 · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cr5j-x763-5676 · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cr5j-x763-5676 · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-19 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 08:06 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-19 08:03 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-111439?
CVE-2026-111439 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. 在 openGauss-server的 src/common/backend/utils/adt/genfile.cpp 模块中，内置函数 pgreadbinaryfileblocks() 存在权限校验逻辑缺陷。该函数在入口处仅校验了起始块号（startBlockNum）和块数量（blockCount）的范围，随后直接调用底层文件读取例程 ReadBinaryFileBlocksFirstCall()。该底层例程仅执行了路径规范化检查以及针对 .. 路径遍历和数据目录边界的基本检查，缺失了对调用者数据库权限（如 SELECT 权限）的校验。此外，辅助函数 isrowdatafile()…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-111439 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-111439 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-111439 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-111439 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-111439?
CVE-2026-111439 has a CVSS base score of 4.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-111439?
No fix for CVE-2026-111439 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (openGauss Community) lists openGauss-server versions 7.0.0-LTS as unaffected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-111439 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-111439
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-111439?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.