lamp-boot 4.16.0-java17 through 4.21.2-java17 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the oauth module's /anyone/findDeptByCompany endpoint that skips URI permission checks. Authenticated low-privilege users can iterate sequential employeeId values to read every employee's department membership within the tenant.
CVE-2026-110763
MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3Trending — 4 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-14. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
4.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists zuihou lamp-boot versions 4.16.0-java17 up to and including 4.21.2-java17 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%The EG Score, 4.3 of 10.Exploitation0% × 40%No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 10th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact partial (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact neither High). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 14, 2026
Last Modified
October 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026No fix on record yet.
Web page
lamp-boot 4.16.0-java17 through 4.21.2-java17 IDOR via /anyone/findDeptByCompany | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lamp-boot-4.16.0-java17-through-4.21.2-java17-idor-via-anyone-finddeptbycompanyWeb page
lamp-boot /anyone/findDeptByCompany reads any employee's department membership without an ownership check - HackMD
https://hackmd.io/@hieuPenguinnn/lamp-boot-finddeptbycompany-employee-idorWeb page
lamp-boot/lamp-oauth/lamp-oauth-controller/src/main/java/top/tangyh/lamp/oauth/controller/UserInfoController.java at ddef8c71de970b915ba1b15e0e9c2dd7414074de · zuihou/lamp-boot · GitHub
https://github.com/zuihou/lamp-boot/blob/ddef8c71de970b915ba1b15e0e9c2dd7414074de/lamp-oauth/lamp-oauth-controller/src/main/java/top/tangyh/lamp/oauth/controller/UserInfoController.java#L167Web page
GitHub - zuihou/lamp-boot: lamp-boot 基于jdk21、jdk17、jdk11、jdk8 + SpringBoot的前后分离的快速开发平台，其中的可配置的SaaS功能尤其闪耀， 具备RBAC功能、网关统一鉴权、Xss防跨站攻击、自动代码生成、多种存储系统、分布式事务、分布式定时任务等多个模块，支持多业务系统并行开发， 支持多服务并行开发，可以作为后端服务的开发脚手架。代码简洁，注释齐全，架构清晰，非常适合...
GitHub - zuihou/lamp-boot: lamp-boot 基于jdk21、jdk17、jdk11、jdk8 + SpringBoot的前后分离的快速开发平台，其中的可配置的SaaS功能尤其闪耀， 具备RBAC功能、网关统一鉴权、Xss防跨站攻击、自动代码生成、多种存储系统、分布式事务、分布式定时任务等多个模块，支持多业务系统并行开发， 支持多服务并行开发，可以作为后端服务的开发脚手架。代码简洁，注释齐全，架构清晰，非常适合学习和企业作为基础框架使用。 · GitHub
https://github.com/zuihou/lamp-bootVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-110763(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
- 2026-10-15 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9cq5-3v6h-r7pm · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-14 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 18:56 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-14 18:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-110763?
CVE-2026-110763 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 14, 2026. lamp-boot 4.16.0-java17 through 4.21.2-java17 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the oauth module's /anyone/findDeptByCompany endpoint that skips URI permission checks. Authenticated low-privilege users can iterate sequential employeeId values to read every employee's…
When was CVE-2026-110763 made public?
CVE-2026-110763 was made public on October 14, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 14, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-110763 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-110763 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-110763?
CVE-2026-110763 has a CVSS base score of 4.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-110763?
No fix for CVE-2026-110763 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists zuihou lamp-boot versions 4.16.0-java17 up to and including 4.21.2-java17 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-110763 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-110763
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-110763?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.