Stills before 25.24.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by supplying crafted media file paths. Attackers can name a media file with $(...) or backticks to execute operating system commands with Node.js process privileges when ffmpeg, ffprobe, gifsicle, or convert runs.
CVE-2026-110649
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-10-14. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation2.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 2.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 84th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 14, 2026
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026Stills before 25.24.2 OS Command Injection via Media File Names | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/stills-before-25.24.2-os-command-injection-via-media-file-namesFinish the shell-injection fix: two more paths reach a shell in 25.24.1
Fix merged in shahkashani/stills PR #30 on 2026-08-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/pull/30Pass file paths to ffprobe/ffmpeg as arguments rather than interpolating them into a shell string
Fix merged in shahkashani/stills PR #29 on 2026-08-05 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/pull/29commit 5694b3b0dcd2 (shahkashani/stills)
Fix landed in shahkashani/stills commit 5694b3b0dcd2 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/commit/5694b3b0dcd2da342f4f0497244129d4c9eb73bccommit 51ba953983ba (shahkashani/stills)
Fix landed in shahkashani/stills commit 51ba953983ba — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/commit/51ba953983ba99915331607bf8530e6089952253stills/lib/content/video.js at 66d5def1265b817d84524473a2813e4781dcbd80 · shahkashani/stills · GitHub
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/blob/66d5def1265b817d84524473a2813e4781dcbd80/lib/content/video.js#L58-L60stills/lib/stills/frames.js at 66d5def1265b817d84524473a2813e4781dcbd80 · shahkashani/stills · GitHub
https://github.com/shahkashani/stills/blob/66d5def1265b817d84524473a2813e4781dcbd80/lib/stills/frames.js#L106-L108Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-110649(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-16 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-53p6-95m7-9c4h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
- 2026-10-14 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-53p6-95m7-9c4h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-53p6-95m7-9c4h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 14:32 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL
- 2026-10-14 14:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-110649?
When was CVE-2026-110649 made public?
Is CVE-2026-110649 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-110649?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-110649?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-110649
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-110649?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.