CVE-2026-109572

HIGHPre-NVD 7.67.6
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-13. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.6; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

Open WebUI from 0.8.6 before 0.11.4 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the terminal proxy that allows authenticated users to reach the Terminals administrator API with the shared key attached. Attackers can send requests through /api/v1/terminals/{server_id}/{path} to list or stop other users' terminals and modify terminal policies, injecting environment variables into other users' terminals.

CVSS v3
7.6
EG Score
7.6HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity76% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.6 of 10.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 12, 2026

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github, github_commit.
Web page

Open WebUI 0.8.6 before 0.11.4 Privilege Escalation via Terminal Proxy | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/open-webui-0.8.6-before-0.11.4-privilege-escalation-via-terminal-proxy
GitHub commit

commit 51bb8cb142f7 (open-webui/open-webui)

Fix landed in open-webui/open-webui commit 51bb8cb142f7 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/51bb8cb142f72503e861eeee25ae4dc73c26c36b
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Terminal users can manage Terminals policies and other users' terminals via the terminal proxy · Advisory · open-webui/open-webui · GitHub

https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-q46m-r89w-j74p

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-109572(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-865q-vfjv-p93j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.6
  3. 2026-10-13 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-13 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-865q-vfjv-p93j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.6
  5. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 22:43 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.6 HIGH
  8. 2026-10-12 22:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-109572?
CVE-2026-109572 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 12, 2026. Open WebUI from 0.8.6 before 0.11.4 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the terminal proxy that allows authenticated users to reach the Terminals administrator API with the shared key attached. Attackers can send requests through /api/v1/terminals/{server_id}/{path} to list or stop…
When was CVE-2026-109572 made public?
CVE-2026-109572 was made public on September 28, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 12, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-109572 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-109572 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-109572?
CVE-2026-109572 has a CVSS base score of 7.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-109572?
A fix for CVE-2026-109572 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-109572 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-109572

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-109572?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.