CVE-2026-109557

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (24th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

EdgeEver through 1.112.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in setMemoDragPreview that allows attackers to inject script through notebook names or memo titles. Attackers can set malicious names via MCP create_notebook, rename_notebook or create_memo tools, running script on drag with access to the desktop bridge's session token.

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity87% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.7 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact both High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
24th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact both High). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CVSS v4.0 confidentiality and integrity impact both High). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 12, 2026

Last Modified

October 12, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

EdgeEver through 1.112.0 Stored XSS via setMemoDragPreview Drag Preview | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/edgeever-through-1.112.0-stored-xss-via-setmemodragpreview-drag-preview
Web page

GitHub - tianma-if/edgeever: Open-source, AI-native knowledge base & Evernote alternative with native MCP. Zero-cost on Cloudflare or Docker. · GitHub

https://github.com/tianma-if/edgeever
Web page

edgeever/apps/web/src/lib/app-helpers.ts at f6ade70423ba366077653dbb8ac43a677933c776 · tianma-if/edgeever · GitHub

https://github.com/tianma-if/edgeever/blob/f6ade70423ba366077653dbb8ac43a677933c776/apps/web/src/lib/app-helpers.ts#L912-L920
GitHub commit

commit 6b5027e8b4be (tianma-if/edgeever)

Fix landed in tianma-if/edgeever commit 6b5027e8b4be — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/tianma-if/edgeever/commit/6b5027e8b4becbee0c0de7cd1a3d04af78ca87ca
Web page

桌面客户端安全加固与发布跟踪(#532–#543) · Issue #546 · tianma-if/edgeever · GitHub

https://github.com/tianma-if/edgeever/issues/546
Web page🟡 PoC Available

[漏洞反馈][CRITICAL] vuln-0047 | 存储型XSS:笔记本名未转义插入 innerHTML(拖拽触发) · Issue #534 · tianma-if/edgeever · GitHub

https://github.com/tianma-if/edgeever/issues/534

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-109557(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 4× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 21:03 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.7 HIGH
  4. 2026-10-12 20:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-109557?
CVE-2026-109557 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 12, 2026. EdgeEver through 1.112.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in setMemoDragPreview that allows attackers to inject script through notebook names or memo titles. Attackers can set malicious names via MCP createnotebook, renamenotebook or create_memo tools, running script on drag…
When was CVE-2026-109557 made public?
CVE-2026-109557 was made public on October 12, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 12, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-109557 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-109557 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (24th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-109557?
CVE-2026-109557 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-109557?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-109557 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-109557 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-109557

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-109557?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.