CVE-2026-108890

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-10-12. The CNA's CVSS baseline 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 6.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

A vulnerability has been found in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. Affected by this issue is the function terminalManager.spawn of the file packages/server/src/browser-handlers/terminal-handler.ts of the component Terminal Handler. The manipulation of the argument cwd leads to improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 48fd0bad5adfe76af9736599699d51a5f60019f6. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
28
EG Risk 28/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity63% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.3 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 12, 2026

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_pr, github_commit.
Web page

GitHub - BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard: Real-time web dashboard for pi coding-agent sessions. Multi-session view, live chat mirroring, integrated terminal, diff viewer, pi-flows execution, and mobile-first remote control via mDNS or zrok tunnel. Coexists with pi's TUI — doesn't replace it. · GitHub

https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/
GitHub commit

commit 48fd0bad5adf (BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard)

Fix landed in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard commit 48fd0bad5adf — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/commit/48fd0bad5adfe76af9736599699d51a5f60019f6
GitHub pull request

fix(fix-ws-origin-cswsh): gate cross-site WebSocket and mutating REST by Origin (#625)

Fix merged in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard PR #636 on 2026-09-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/pull/636
Web page

Unauthenticated Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) in the local dashboard server leads to Remote Code Execution · Issue #625 · BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · GitHub

https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/issues/625

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-108890(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q84p-gr6q-mp6g · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  3. 2026-10-13 15:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v4 → 5.3
  4. 2026-10-13 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-13 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q84p-gr6q-mp6g · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  6. 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
  8. 2026-10-12 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-12 14:24 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
  10. 2026-10-12 13:54 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.3 MEDIUM
  11. 2026-10-12 13:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-108890?
CVE-2026-108890 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 12, 2026. A vulnerability has been found in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. Affected by this issue is the function terminalManager.spawn of the file packages/server/src/browser-handlers/terminal-handler.ts of the component Terminal Handler. The manipulation of the argument cwd leads to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-108890 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-108890 was published on October 12, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-108890?
CVE-2026-108890 has a CVSS base score of 6.3 (the CNA's own assessment, by vuldb; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-108890?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-108890 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-108890 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-108890

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-108890?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.