CVE-2026-108737

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists Traccar versions up to and including 6.16.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Traccar through 6.16.0 contains a weak password recovery vulnerability that allows attackers to reuse password reset tokens as session credentials because TokenManager does not bind tokens to a purpose. Attackers holding a leaked reset link can obtain a full session via /api/session or change passwords via /api/password/update, retaining access for seven days even after the victim resets their password.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
47
EG Risk 47/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity68% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.8 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 11, 2026

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 11, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Traccar through 6.16.0 Weak Password Recovery via TokenManager Token Purpose Confusion | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/traccar-through-6.16.0-weak-password-recovery-via-tokenmanager-token-purpose-confusion
Web page

GitHub - traccar/traccar: Open source GPS tracking platform - self-hosted or managed, 200+ device protocols · GitHub

https://github.com/traccar/traccar
Web page

traccar/src/main/java/org/traccar/api/resource/SessionResource.java at cfab560c79ee9c9eaa41c79c6df351e820d6284b · traccar/traccar · GitHub

https://github.com/traccar/traccar/blob/cfab560c79ee9c9eaa41c79c6df351e820d6284b/src/main/java/org/traccar/api/resource/SessionResource.java#L77-L93
Web page

Traccar: one signed token with no purpose claim turns a password reset link into a full API session and lets any token reset the account password - HackMD

https://hackmd.io/@haind/traccar-token-purpose-confusion

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-108737(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrx-94v4-66vp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  3. 2026-10-13 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-13 20:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrx-94v4-66vp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  5. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 12:37 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.8 MEDIUM
  13. 2026-10-11 12:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-108737?
CVE-2026-108737 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 11, 2026. Traccar through 6.16.0 contains a weak password recovery vulnerability that allows attackers to reuse password reset tokens as session credentials because TokenManager does not bind tokens to a purpose. Attackers holding a leaked reset link can obtain a full session via /api/session or change…
When was CVE-2026-108737 made public?
CVE-2026-108737 was made public on October 10, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 11, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-108737 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-108737 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-108737?
CVE-2026-108737 has a CVSS base score of 6.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-108737?
No fix for CVE-2026-108737 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists Traccar versions up to and including 6.16.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-108737 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-108737

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-108737?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.