CVE-2026-108604

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Tabularis through 0.27.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the MCP run_query safety gate that allows prompt-injected agents or untrusted MCP clients to bypass read-only mode by submitting side-effecting SELECT statements. Attackers can run statements like SELECT setval, nextval, or PostgreSQL query_to_xml with embedded DELETE to modify data without approval prompts.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
28
EG Risk 28/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity63% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.3 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 10, 2026

Last Modified

October 10, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Tabularis through 0.27.0 Read-Only Bypass via MCP run_query SELECT Classification | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tabularis-through-0.27.0-read-only-bypass-via-mcp-run-query-select-classification
Web page

Tabularis MCP: side-effecting SELECT bypasses read-only mode and the write-approval gate - HackMD

https://hackmd.io/@haind/S1BofaIsMx
Web page

tabularis/src-tauri/src/mcp/mod.rs at 804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9 · TabularisDB/tabularis · GitHub

https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/blob/804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9/src-tauri/src/mcp/mod.rs#L1136-L1171
Web page

tabularis/src-tauri/src/ai_activity.rs at 804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9 · TabularisDB/tabularis · GitHub

https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/blob/804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9/src-tauri/src/ai_activity.rs#L357-L416
Web page

GitHub - TabularisDB/tabularis: Open-source desktop SQL workspace with 3 built-in database drivers and 16 shipped plugins, including SQL Server, DuckDB, ClickHouse and Redis. Built-in MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Devin, SQL notebooks and visual EXPLAIN. · GitHub

https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-108604(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-11 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jj9h-m6r9-g37h · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  3. 2026-10-11 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.3 MEDIUM
  9. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-108604?
CVE-2026-108604 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 10, 2026. Tabularis through 0.27.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the MCP runquery safety gate that allows prompt-injected agents or untrusted MCP clients to bypass read-only mode by submitting side-effecting SELECT statements. Attackers can run statements like SELECT setval, nextval,…
When was CVE-2026-108604 made public?
CVE-2026-108604 was made public on October 9, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 10, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 10, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-108604 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-108604 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-108604?
CVE-2026-108604 has a CVSS base score of 6.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-108604?
No fix for CVE-2026-108604 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-108604 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-108604

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-108604?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.