CVE-2026-108576

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: secondary
10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A vulnerability was found in TOZED X300 up to 6.01.3. This vulnerability affects the function process_ping of the component IPPingDiagnostics Handler. The manipulation of the argument Host results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALlow confidence
EG Risk
50
EG Risk 50/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
The EG Score, 10.0 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability30% × 15%
EchelonGraph's default: CISA has not published Automatable for this CVE.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

Published

October 11, 2026

Last Modified

October 11, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 11, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: github.
githubMentions a patch (unverified)

Tozed ZLT X300 5G CPE — Remote Root Code Execution via SDR Rogue Base Station · Advisory · danish1162/CVE-2026-2035703-x300 · GitHub

https://github.com/danish1162/CVE-2026-2035703-x300/security/advisories/GHSA-qcpp-vfr2-v242

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-11 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 12:39 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 12:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-108576?
CVE-2026-108576 is a critical vulnerability published on October 11, 2026. A vulnerability was found in TOZED X300 up to 6.01.3. This vulnerability affects the function process_ping of the component IPPingDiagnostics Handler. The manipulation of the argument Host results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-108576 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-108576 was published on October 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-108576?
CVE-2026-108576 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-108576?
No fix for CVE-2026-108576 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-108576

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-108576?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.