CVE-2026-10849

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 75% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in response_json_cb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When the full response has arrived, the code writes response_data[downloaded_size] = '\0' — and whenever the accumulated body length equals the allocation, that terminator lands one byte past the end of the heap object (a heap-based out-of-bounds write, CWE-122 / CWE-787).

The body length and fragmentation are taken directly from the parsed HTTP response (rsp->body_frag_start / rsp->body_frag_len) and are fully controlled by the remote hawkBit server, which chooses its own response length. The precise trigger depends on how the buffer grows, and both forms are remotely reachable. Since v4.0.0 the reallocation is sized to exactly downloaded_size + body_len, so any response body larger than the 1100-byte initial buffer makes the out-of-bounds write deterministic; such response sizes are normal for hawkBit deployment metadata. Before v4.0.0 the buffer grew by doubling and the growth check ((downloaded_size + body_len) > response_buffer_size) is false at equality, so a response body whose length is exactly the current allocation — 1100 bytes with the default initial buffer — skips the reallocation entirely and writes the terminator at response_data[1100] of an 1100-byte object. The HTTP length-mismatch check does not catch this, because the declared and received lengths genuinely agree. Either form is reachable by a malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle update server (TLS is optional and, when enabled, does not protect against a hostile server), with no authentication of response content and no client-side length cap protecting the write.

The out-of-bounds write is a fixed single NUL byte immediately following the allocation, corrupting adjacent allocator metadata or the next allocation. The practical impact is heap corruption leading to denial of service (fault on a subsequent allocation or free), with the bounded, allocator-dependent possibility of further corruption. The fix sizes the buffer to the body length plus one and copies with memcpy, ensuring the terminator always lands within the allocation.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
25%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 3, 2026

Last Modified

August 9, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Remote 1-byte heap out-of-bounds write in Zephyr hawkBit response assembly · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-39h3-7phx-pwhv
github_commit

commit 59d7ab58d853 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 59d7ab58d853 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/59d7ab58d853489e6134081cadb11733730264ac

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-27 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-26 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-25 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-24 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-23 04:41 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-22 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-16 21:28 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-15 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
Show 25 more
  1. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-14 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-12 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-11 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-11 04:22 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-09 14:44 UTCEG score recompute 0.70
  11. 2026-08-09 14:44 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.5
  12. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-08 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-07 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-06 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-05 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-04 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-04 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-03 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-03 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-03 21:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-10849?
CVE-2026-10849 is a high vulnerability published on August 3, 2026. The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in responsejsoncb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When…
When was CVE-2026-10849 disclosed?
CVE-2026-10849 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 3, 2026, with the most recent update on August 9, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-10849 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-10849 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 74.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10849?
CVE-2026-10849 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10849?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-10849, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10849

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10849?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.