SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, MaybeFlipBitmap() asks GDI+ to read the attacker-controlled PropertyTagOrientation size through GetPropertyItem() while supplying only a fixed 64-byte buf on the stack. Opening a crafted TIFF with enough EXIF Orientation values can cause attacker-selected bytes to overwrite stack control data, while tested builds terminate through the stack cookie check. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.
CVE-2026-107736
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1% (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 6.8
- EG Score
- 6.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 31EG Risk 31/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity68% × 45%The EG Score, 6.8 of 10.Exploitation0% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
October 8, 2026
Last Modified
October 9, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026commit 6fe2e0239d8e (sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf)
Fix landed in sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf commit 6fe2e0239d8e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf/commit/6fe2e0239d8ef3466174ac92f3f56e967ce1a4a7stack buffer overflow while processing EXIF Orientation metadata · Advisory · sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf · GitHub
https://github.com/sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf/security/advisories/GHSA-px68-7vwv-mxprWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-10 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 22:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-107736?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-107736 published?
Is CVE-2026-107736 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-107736?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-107736?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-107736
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-107736?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.