CVE-2026-107613

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.95.9
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-08. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

Upgrade TightVNC for Windows to version 2.8.88 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Securin) — apply it.

A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the Win8ScreenDriver component of GlavSoft TightVNC Server for Windows before 2.8.88 allows an attacker to crash the server, causing a denial of service. When re-initialization of the DXGI Desktop Duplication driver fails in applyNewScreenProperties() (for example after a GPU reset, display hot-plug or session change), m_drvImpl is left NULL and is subsequently dereferenced without a check by executeDetection(), getScreenBuffer(), grabFb(), getScreenPropertiesChanged() and getCursorPosition().

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity59% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.9 of 10.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Upgrade TightVNC for Windows to version 2.8.88 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Securin). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

Upgrade TightVNC for Windows to version 2.8.88 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Securin). Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 8, 2026

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Securin).
Web page

TightVNC: What's New in TightVNC

https://www.tightvnc.com/whatsnew.php
Web page

TightVNC / Bugs / #1660 Server crashes after screen properties update fails on Win8/DXGI path (2.8.87)

https://sourceforge.net/p/vnc-tight/bugs/1660/

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-107613(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c4jj-c6x2-r973 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  4. 2026-10-11 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c4jj-c6x2-r973 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  10. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c4jj-c6x2-r973 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  13. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-08 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c4jj-c6x2-r973 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  16. 2026-10-08 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-08 13:52 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.9 MEDIUM
  18. 2026-10-08 13:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-107613?
CVE-2026-107613 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 8, 2026. A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the Win8ScreenDriver component of GlavSoft TightVNC Server for Windows before 2.8.88 allows an attacker to crash the server, causing a denial of service. When re-initialization of the DXGI Desktop Duplication driver fails in applyNewScreenProperties()…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-107613 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-107613 was published on October 8, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-107613 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-107613 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-107613?
CVE-2026-107613 has a CVSS base score of 5.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-107613?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-107613, written by its CNA Securin, names the fix: "Upgrade TightVNC for Windows to version 2.8.88 or later." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-107613 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-107613

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-107613?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.