EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- •High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (NetScaler) lists NetScaler ADC versions before 14.1-73.46 and before 13.1-64.29; NetScaler Gateway versions before 14.1-73.46 and before 13.1-64.29 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
Memory overflow vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution or Denial of Service Vulnerability in NetScaler ADC.
NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway must be configured as a SAML SP or SAML IdP, subject to the following version-specific requirements:
* For the following versions: Applicable only when configured as a SAML IdP:
* NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway between 14.1-73.37 and 14.1-73.41, inclusive
* NetScaler ADC 14.1-FIPS between 14.1-73.37 FIPS and 14.1-73.41 FIPS, inclusive
* NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway between 13.1-64.23 and 13.1-64.28, inclusive
* NetScaler ADC 13.1-FIPS between 13.1-NDcPP 13.1-37.279 and 13.1- 37.282, inclusive
For the following versions: Applicable only when configured as a SAML SP or SAML IdP:
* NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway before 14.1-73.37
* NetScaler ADC 14.1-FIPS before 14.1-73.37 FIPS
* NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway before 13.1-64.23
* NetScaler ADC 13.1-FIPS before13.1-NDcPP 13.1-37.279
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it