The Classic (BR/EDR) L2CAP signaling handlers l2cap_br_conf_req() and l2cap_br_conf_rsp() in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/l2cap_br.c validated the minimum command size against buf->len (the bytes remaining in the whole received PDU) instead of len (the per-command data length from the L2CAP signaling header). Because multiple signaling commands can be packed into one PDU, buf->len may exceed a command's len. An attacker can send a CONF_REQ command with a header length smaller than the configuration-request structure (e.g. 0), followed by another command so that buf->len still satisfies the check. The check then passes incorrectly and opt_len = len - sizeof(*req) underflows the uint16_t to a near-0xFFFF value. The configuration-option loop, which lacks an opt_len-versus-buf->len guard, then walks far past the end of the pooled ACL receive buffer using net_buf pull primitives that perform no runtime bounds check, producing an out-of-bounds read of host memory and, when the out-of-bounds option bytes encode an MTU or flush-timeout option, an out-of-bounds write. The BR/EDR signaling channel is processed before pairing/encryption and an L2CAP channel to an L0 service such as SDP can be opened without pairing, so an unauthenticated peer within radio range that can establish an ACL connection can trigger the flaw, leading to memory corruption and denial of service (host/device crash). The defect is present in released versions including v4.4.0. The fix validates against len instead of buf->len in both handlers.
CVE-2026-10680
This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6(medium)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity76% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 21, 2026
Last Modified
July 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026Out-of-bounds access in Zephyr BR/EDR L2CAP configuration request handling via `uint16_t` length underflow · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-vrwx-p97q-8854commit 1d451683377f (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)
Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 1d451683377f — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/1d451683377f4c8e56d7718565bea7b5c1155159Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 02:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 41 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-15 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-31 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-21 21:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-125
- CVE-2013-0767EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-2523EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2014-2898EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2897EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2896EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-1999-0006EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-1522EG 9.3EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2013-0779EG 9.3EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2013-0778EG 9.3EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2012-3995EG 9.3EPSS p92HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-10680?
When was CVE-2026-10680 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-10680 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10680?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10680?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10680
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10680?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.