CVE-2026-10680

HIGHPre-NVD 7.67.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
7.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.6Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The Classic (BR/EDR) L2CAP signaling handlers l2cap_br_conf_req() and l2cap_br_conf_rsp() in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/l2cap_br.c validated the minimum command size against buf->len (the bytes remaining in the whole received PDU) instead of len (the per-command data length from the L2CAP signaling header). Because multiple signaling commands can be packed into one PDU, buf->len may exceed a command's len. An attacker can send a CONF_REQ command with a header length smaller than the configuration-request structure (e.g. 0), followed by another command so that buf->len still satisfies the check. The check then passes incorrectly and opt_len = len - sizeof(*req) underflows the uint16_t to a near-0xFFFF value. The configuration-option loop, which lacks an opt_len-versus-buf->len guard, then walks far past the end of the pooled ACL receive buffer using net_buf pull primitives that perform no runtime bounds check, producing an out-of-bounds read of host memory and, when the out-of-bounds option bytes encode an MTU or flush-timeout option, an out-of-bounds write. The BR/EDR signaling channel is processed before pairing/encryption and an L2CAP channel to an L0 service such as SDP can be opened without pairing, so an unauthenticated peer within radio range that can establish an ACL connection can trigger the flaw, leading to memory corruption and denial of service (host/device crash). The defect is present in released versions including v4.4.0. The fix validates against len instead of buf->len in both handlers.

CVSS v3
7.6
EG Score
7.6(medium)
EG Risk
34(Track)
EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity76% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 21, 2026

Last Modified

July 30, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Out-of-bounds access in Zephyr BR/EDR L2CAP configuration request handling via `uint16_t` length underflow · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-vrwx-p97q-8854
github_commit

commit 1d451683377f (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 1d451683377f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/1d451683377f4c8e56d7718565bea7b5c1155159

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-28 02:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-26 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-24 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-20 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-19 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-18 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-17 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-16 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 41 more
  1. 2026-08-15 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-14 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-12 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-11 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-11 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-09 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-08 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-07 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-06 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-05 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-03 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-02 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-01 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-31 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-30 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-28 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-26 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-07-26 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-23 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-07-22 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-21 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-07-21 21:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-10680?
CVE-2026-10680 is a high vulnerability published on July 21, 2026. The Classic (BR/EDR) L2CAP signaling handlers l2capbrconfreq() and l2capbrconfrsp() in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/l2capbr.c validated the minimum command size against buf->len (the bytes remaining in the whole received PDU) instead of len (the per-command data length from the L2CAP signaling…
When was CVE-2026-10680 disclosed?
CVE-2026-10680 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 21, 2026, with the most recent update on July 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-10680 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-10680 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10680?
CVE-2026-10680 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.6 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10680?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-10680, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10680

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10680?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.