Joplin is an open source note-taking and to-do application that organises notes and lists into notebooks. Prior to 3.7.13, selecting a note containing a jsoncanvas fence causes the whiteboard text and file-node components in packages/app-desktop/gui/NoteEditor/NoteBody/WhiteboardEditor/nodes/TextNode.tsx and packages/app-desktop/gui/NoteEditor/NoteBody/WhiteboardEditor/nodes/FileNode.tsx to render card content with the full Markdown renderer. The components insert the resulting HTML into the main application document through dangerouslySetInnerHTML. A malicious note can inject style elements and remote CSS imports that modify trusted application chrome, signal when the note is opened, and potentially disclose exposed attribute values. Content Security Policy blocks inline script execution, so the supported impact is CSS injection and UI redressing rather than code execution. This issue is fixed in version 3.7.13.
CVE-2026-105784
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.6
- EG Score
- 4.6MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 37EG Risk 37/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity46% × 45%The EG Score, 4.6 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 8th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 5, 2026
Last Modified
October 6, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026v3.7.13
Patch available: laurent22/joplin v3.7.13 (pre-release)
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/releases/tag/v3.7.13commit 7fb9ec93e47c (laurent22/joplin)
Fix landed in laurent22/joplin commit 7fb9ec93e47c — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/commit/7fb9ec93e47cec39a548a76e03d7ad660ca0f123Desktop: Strip style elements from whiteboard card content
Fix merged in laurent22/joplin PR #16275 on 2026-08-22 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/pull/16275Whiteboard note content is rendered into the main application document, bypassing the note-viewer origin isolation and allowing CSS injection with a remote-controlled exfiltration channel · Advisory · laurent22/joplin · GitHub
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/security/advisories/GHSA-6h4j-86j4-x4q4Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-07 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-06 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 23:27 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.6 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-05 23:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105784?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-105784 published?
Is CVE-2026-105784 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105784?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105784?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105784
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105784?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.