ZITADEL 4.x before 4.17.3 and 3.x through 3.4.15 protects IdP intent tokens with unauthenticated, malleable encryption, allowing authenticated users to tamper with their own token so it is accepted for another user's external login intent. An attacker who predicts a victim's in-flight intent identifier and wins a timing race can call /v2/idp_intents or /v2/sessions to steal the victim's IdP tokens or hijack their session.
CVE-2026-105208
Score 7.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-04. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.7
- EG Score
- 7.7HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity77% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- —
- EPSS %ILE
- —
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 4, 2026
Last Modified
October 4, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 4, 2026ZITADEL before 4.17.3 Session Hijacking via Forgeable IdP Intent Tokens | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/zitadel-before-4.17.3-session-hijacking-via-forgeable-idp-intent-tokensCross-user session hijacking and external IdP token theft via forgeable IdP intent tokens · Advisory · zitadel/zitadel · GitHub
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-jh3m-cr2x-qp88Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-105208(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 14:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2026-105208?
When was CVE-2026-105208 disclosed?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105208?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105208?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105208
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105208?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.