The EnergizeLab Eilik NestJS auth service issues device tokens for arbitrary robot serial numbers without authentication. An unauthenticated remote attacker can obtain a valid device token for any serial number and act as that device against the cloud services.
CVE-2026-105034
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 52EG Risk 52/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity82% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 15, 2026
Last Modified
October 16, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026Your secrets aren’t safe with this cute robot toy — they’re on Chinese servers ready to be hacked | The Verge
https://www.theverge.com/tech/1010727/eiliko-robot-hack-energize-labhttp://takeonme.org/cves/multiple-energizelab-eilik-eiliko-platform-vulnerabilities/
https://takeonme.org/gcves/GCVE-1337-2026-00000000000000000001111111111100000000000000000000000011111111001111111111000000000000000000010110111111111100000000000000000001110/GitHub - xn0tsa/your-secrets-are-safe-with-me: Energizelab Eilik: nightly child profiling, a glass back office a forged token reads, and the robots' beliefs live in a public Redis key anyone can rewrite. 57 findings. · GitHub
https://github.com/xn0tsa/your-secrets-are-safe-with-meVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-105034(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-18 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-16 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hf39-9v59-92m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
- 2026-10-16 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hf39-9v59-92m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-16 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hf39-9v59-92m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
- 2026-10-15 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hf39-9v59-92m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
- 2026-10-15 20:47 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.2 HIGH
- 2026-10-15 20:47 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-306 · CWE-287
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105034?
When was CVE-2026-105034 made public?
Is CVE-2026-105034 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105034?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105034?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105034
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105034?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.