A flaw was found in SSSD. A local attacker can exploit this issue by sending a specially crafted request with an invalid packet length to the autofs responder UNIX socket. This causes an integer underflow and an out-of-bounds memory read, which can crash the responder process and result in a denial of service (DoS).
CVE-2026-104037
Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-06. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 5.5
- EG Score
- 5.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity55% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- <0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- below the 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 6, 2026
Last Modified
October 6, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 6, 20262479030 – (CVE-2026-104037) CVE-2026-104037 sssd: sssd: Denial of Service via packet length underflow in autofs responder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479030CVE-2026-104037 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-104037Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-104037(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-07 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-06 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 00:40 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-104037?
When was CVE-2026-104037 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-104037 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-104037?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-104037?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-104037
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-104037?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.