Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). Elasticsearch enforces a size limit on the user-supplied metadata field for each individual template resource, but does not limit the total memory used when multiple such resources are retrieved together. A user holding the *manage_index_templates* cluster privilege can register multiple resources each within the individual limit. Retrieving them together materializes all of their metadata values in memory at once, exhausting available heap and causing the affected node to fail with an out-of-memory error, resulting in a denial of service.
CVE-2026-102411
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-06. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- —
- EPSS %ILE
- —
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 6, 2026
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 6, 2026Elasticsearch 9.4.7, 9.5.3, 8.19.23 Security Update (ESA-2026-192) - Security Announcements - Discuss the Elastic Stack
https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-9-4-7-9-5-3-8-19-23-security-update-esa-2026-192/390865Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-102411(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-07 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 19:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2026-102411?
When was CVE-2026-102411 disclosed?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102411?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102411?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102411
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102411?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.